ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Search engines evaluation for P2P based digital libraries
Full text PdfPdf (216 KB)
Source Euro American Conference On Telematics And Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 2008 Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems table of contents
Aracaju, Brazil
Article No. 32  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-988-3
Authors
Marco Fernandes  Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Joaquim A. Martins  Universidade de Aveiro
Joaquim S. Pinto  Universidade de Aveiro
Pedro Almeida  Universidade de Aveiro
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 3,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621087.1621119
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Indexing and searching services play a critical role in digital libraries. They are responsible for maintaining an index of the existing resources and responding to search queries. Traditional systems store these indexes using a centralized approach, but recent distributed computing paradigms bring new challenges to the storage of information and query processing. In this paper, we will discuss the new trends in the area of P2P based digital libraries and which challenges they place for these services. In the second part of the paper, we evaluate different engines according to defined objectives and propose changes accordingly.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Almeida, P., Fernandes, M., Alho, A., Martins, J., Pinto, J. 2006. SInBAD - A digital library to aggregate multimedia documents. AICT-ICIW'06, 173--179.
 
2
Apache Software Foundation (accessed March 2008) Lucene.Net, http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/.
 
3
Beg, M. M. S. 2005. A subjective measure of web search quality. Information Sciences 169 Issues 3--4, 365--381.
 
4
DCMI (accessed January 2007) Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. http://dublincore.org.
 
5
Index Data (accessed March 2008) Zebra. http://www.indexdata.dk/zebra.
 
6
Indri (accessed March 2008) Indri. http://www.lemurproject.org/indri.
 
7
Microsoft Corporation (accessed July 2007) What is Indexing Service?. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/indexsrv/html/ixintro_0311.asp.
 
8
QuiLogic/DV Inc. (accessed March 2007) XML IFilter for indexing XML files. http://www.quilogic.cc/ifilter.htm.
 
9
Shang, Y., Li, L. 2002. Precision evaluation of search engines. World Wide Web: Internet and Web Information Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2, Springer.
 
10
SourceForge (accessed March 2008) Swish-e::Home Page. http://swish-e.org.
 
11
University of Glasgow (accessed March 2008) Terrier Information Retrieval Platform. http://ir.dcs.gla.ac.uk/terrier