ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Video viewing preferences for HDR displays under varying ambient illumination
Full text PdfPdf (800 KB)
Source Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization archive
Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization table of contents
Chania, Crete, Greece
SESSION: Displays and visualization table of contents
Pages 45-52  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-743-1
Authors
Allan G. Rempel  The University of British Columbia and Dolby Canada
Wolfgang Heidrich  The University of British Columbia
Hiroe Li  Dolby Canada
Rafał Mantiuk  The University of British Columbia
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1620993.1621004
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recent high dynamic range (HDR) display devices provide significantly greater output brightness and dynamic range compared to conventional display technology. A possible concern for the extended use of HDR displays is the potential to cause visual fatigue. Furthermore, ambient illumination has a significant effect on the perception of the imagery displayed, and its impact on user preferences for brightness and contrast must be understood.

In our work we examine these issues by conducting two user studies. In each study, subjects watched video content on an HDR display in several different ambient illumination environments, and were asked to adjust the brightness and black level of the display to their preference. Subjects were also given questionnaires to document their observations and subjective preferences as well as any visual fatigue they may have experienced. We found that subjects experienced minimal visual fatigue, and also found statistically significant differences in preferred display settings under different ambient lighting conditions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Acosta-Serafini, P., Masaki, I., and Sodini, C., 2000. Single-chip imager system with programmable dynamic range. U.S Patent 6,977,685, Feb.
 
2
Akyüz, A., Reinhard, E., Fleming, R., Riecke, B., and Buelthoff, H. 2007. Do HDR displays support LDR content? A psychophysical evaluation. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. ACM Siggraph) 26, 3, Article 38.
 
3
Ashikhmin, M., and Goyal, J. 2006. A reality check for tonemapping operators. ACM Trans. Applied Perception 3, 4, 399--411.
 
4
Banterle, F., Ledda, P., Debattista, K., and Chalmers, A. 2006. Inverse tone mapping. In Proc. of GRAPHITE '06, 349--356.
 
5
Bartleson, C. J., and Breneman, E. J. 1967. Brightness reproduction in the photographic process. Photographic Science and Engineering 11, 4, 254--262.
 
6
Beranek, L. L. 1957. Criteria for noise in buildings. NOISE Control 3, 1, 19--27.
 
7
Cappels, R. D., and Hernandez, M., 1997. System and method for adjusting the output of an output device to compensate for ambient illumination. U.S Patent 5,670,985, Sept.
 
8
De Marsh, L. E. 1972. Optimum telecine transfer characteristics. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers 81, 784--787.
 
9
Devlin, K., Chalmers, A., and Reinhard, E. 2006. Visual calibration and correction for ambient illumination. ACM Trans. Applied Perception 3, 4, 429--452.
 
10
Didyk, P., Mantiuk, R., Hein, M., and Seidel, H. 2008. Enhancement of bright video features for hdr displays. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 1265--1274.
 
11
Dillon, T. W., and Emurian, H. H. 1995. Reports of visual fatigue resulting from use of a video display unit. Computers in Human Behavior 11, 1, 77--84.
 
12
Dillon, T. W., and Emurian, H. H. 1996. Some factors affecting reports of visual fatigue resulting from use of a VDU. Computers in Human Behavior 12, 1, 49--59.
 
13
Dror, R., Willsky, A., and Adelson, E. 2004. Statistical characterization of real-world illumination. Journal of Vision 4, 9, 821--837.
 
14
Ghosh, A., Trentacoste, M., Seetzen, H., and Heidrich, W. 2005. Real illumination from virtual environments. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 243--252.
 
15
Ishihara, S. 2007. Ishihara's Tests for Colour Deficiency. Kanehara Trading Inc.
 
16
ITU. 1990. ITU-R BT.709, basic parameter values for the HDTV standard for the studio and for international programme exchange. Standard Recommendation 709, International Telecommunication Union.
 
17
Kalmanash, M. H., 1993. Back-light for liquid crystal devices. U.S Patent 5,211,463, May.
 
18
Karwowski, W. 2001. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. Taylor & Francis.
 
19
Katyl, R. H., Greene, R. G., Yost, B., and Krusius, J. P., 2001. Correction methods for brightness in electronic display. U.S Patent 6,275,825, Aug.
 
20
Ledda, P., Chalmers, A., Troscianko, T., and Seetzen, H. 2005. Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a high dynamic range display. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. ACM Siggraph) 24, 3, 640--648.
 
21
Likert, R., Roslow, S., and Murphy, G. 1934. A simple and reliable method of scoring the Thurstone attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology 5, 228--238.
 
22
Mantiuk, R., Krawczyk, G., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2004. Perception-motivated high dynamic range video encoding. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. of ACM Siggraph) 23, 3, 733--741.
 
23
Mantiuk, R., Efremov, A., Krawczyk, G., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2006. Backward compatible high dynamic range MPEG video compression. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. of ACM Siggraph) 25, 3, 713--723.
 
24
Mantiuk, R., Daly, S., and Kerofsky, L. 2008. Display adaptive tone mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. of ACM Siggraph) 27, 3, Article 68.
 
25
Merrifield, R., and Silverstein, L. D. 1988. The ABC's of automatic brightness control. In Society for Information Display Internatiational Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 178--181.
 
26
Meylan, L., Daly, S., and Süsstrunk, S. 2006. The reproduction of specular highlights on high dynamic range displays. In Proc. of the 14th Color Imaging Conference.
 
27
Meylan, L., Daly, S., and Süsstrunk, S. 2007. Tone mapping for high dynamic range displays. In Proc. of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XII, vol. 6492.
 
28
Novick, S. B. 1969. Tone reproduction from colour telecine systems. British Kinematography Sound And Television 51, 10, 342--347.
 
29
Pattanaik, S. N., Ferwerda, J. A., Fairchild, M. D., and Greenberg, D. 1998. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. In Proc. of ACM Siggraph '98, 287--298.
 
30
Philips, 2008. Philips ambilight. http://www.misc.philips.com/ambilight/uk/index2.html, accessed Nov. 19, 2008.
 
31
Pittman, C. R., 1976. Ambient light responsive illumination brightness control circuit. U.S Patent 3,962,600, June.
 
32
Reinhard, E., Stark, M., Shirley, P., and Ferwerda, J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. of ACM Siggraph) 21, 3, 267--276.
 
33
Rempel, A. G., Trentacoste, M., Seetzen, H., Young, H. D., Heidrich, W., Whitehead, L., and Ward, G. 2007. Ldr2hdr: On-the-fly reverse tone mapping of legacy video and photographs. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. of ACM Siggraph) 26, 3, Article 39.
 
34
Ruderman, D. L. 1994. The statistics of natural images. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 5, 598--605.
 
35
Seetzen, H., Whitehead, L., and Ward, G. 2003. A high dynamic range display using low and high resolution modulators. In Society for Information Display Internatiational Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 1450--1453.
 
36
Seetzen, H., Heidrich, W., Stuerzlinger, W., Ward, G., Whitehead, L., Trentacoste, M., Ghosh, A., and Vorozcovs, A. 2004. High dynamic range display systems. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. ACM Siggraph) 23, 3, 760--768.
 
37
Seetzen, H., Li, H., Ye, L., Heidrich, W., Whitehead, L., and Ward, G. 2006. Observations of luminance, contrast, and amplitude resolution of displays. In Society for Information Display (SID) Digest, 1229--1233.
 
38
Stevens, J. C., and Stevens, S. S. 1963. Brightness function: Effects of adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America 53, 3, 375--385.
 
39
Stevens, S. S. 1961. To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science 133, 3446, 80--86.
 
40
Swinkels, S., Heynderickx, I., Yeates, D., and Essers, M. 2008. Ambient light control for mobile displays. In Society for Information Display Internatiational Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 1006--1009.
 
41
Čadík, M., Wimmer, M., Neumann, L., and Artusi, A. 2008. Evaluation of HDR tone mapping methods using essential perceptual attributes. Computers & Graphics 32, 330--349.
 
42
Ward, G., and Simmons, M. 2005. JPEG-HDR: A backwards-compatible, high dynamic range extension to JPEG. In Proc. of Color Imaging Conference (CIC) '05.
 
43
Yoshida, A., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2006. Analysis of reproducing real-world appearance on displays of varying dynamic range. In Proc. of Eurographics 2006, 415--426.
 
44
Yoshida, A., Blanz, V., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2007. Testing tone mapping operators with human-perceived reality. Journal of Electronic Imaging 16, 1, 013004-1--013004-14.