Transitional environments enhance distance perception in immersive virtual reality systems

ABSTRACT

Several experiments have provided evidence that ego-centric distances are perceived as compressed in immersive virtual environments relative to the real world. The principal factors responsible for this phenomenon have remained largely unknown. However, recent experiments suggest that when the virtual environment (VE) is an exact replica of a user's real physical surroundings, the person's distance perception improves. Furthermore, it has been shown that when users start their virtual reality (VR) experience in such a virtual replica and then gradually transition to a different VE, their sense of presence in the actual virtual world increases significantly. In this case the virtual replica serves as a transitional environment between the real and virtual world.

In this paper we examine whether a person's distance estimation skills can be transferred from a transitional environment to a different VE. We have conducted blind walking experiments to analyze if starting the VR experience in a transitional environment can improve a person's ability to estimate distances in an immersive VR system. We found that users significantly improve their distance estimation skills when they enter the virtual world via a transitional environment.

REFERENCES

• 1: Banton, T., Stefanucci, J., Durgin, F., Fass, A., and Proffitt, D. 2005. The perception of walking speed in a virtual environment. Presence 14, 4, 394--406.
• 2: Bruder, G., Steinicke, F., and Hinrichs, K. 2009. Arch-explore: A natural user interface for immersive architectural walkthroughs. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 75--82.
• 3: Burdea, G., and Coiffet, P. 2003. Virtual Reality Technology. Wiley-IEEE Press.
• 4: Elliot, D. 1987. The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation. Journal of Motor Behavior 19, 4, 476--485.
• 5: Frenz, H., Lappe, M., Kolesnik, M., and Bührmann, T. 2007. Estimation of travel distance from visual motion in virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 4, 419--428.
• 6: Fukusima, S. S., Loomis, J. M., and Silva, J. A. D. 1997. Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23, 1, 86--100.
• 7: Gooch, A. A., and Willemsen, P. 2002. Evaluating space perception in npr immersive environments. In Proceedings of Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 105--110.
• 8: Interrante, V., Anderson, L., and Ries, B. 2006. Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality, IEEE, 3--10.
• 9: Interrante, V., Ries, B., Lindquist, J., and Anderson, L. 2007. Elucidating the Factors that can Facilitate Veridical Spatial Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality, IEEE, 11--18.
• 10: Kuhl, S., Thompson, W., and Creem-Regehr, S. 2006. Minification influences spatial judgments in virtual environments. In In Proc. Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 15--19.
• 11: Kuhl, S., Thompson, W., and Creem-Regehr, S. 2008. HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. In Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization.
• 12: Lappe, M., Jenkin, M., and Harris, L. R. 2007. Travel distance estimation from visual motion by leaky path integration. Exp. Brain Res. 180, 35--48.
• 13: Loomis, J. M., and Knapp, J. M. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and adaptive environments, L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, Eds., vol. Virtual and adaptive environments. Mahwah.
• 14: Messing, R., and Durgin, F. H. 2005. Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Trans. on Appl. Perception 2, 3, 234--250.
• 15: Mohler, B., Bülthoff, H. H., Thompson, W. B., and Creem-Regehr, S. H. 2008. A full-body avatar improves ego-centric distance judgments in an immersive virtual environment. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV 08), ACM Press, 194--197.
• 16: Pagano, C. C., and Bingham, G. P. 1998. Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 4, 1037--1051.
• 17: Redlick, F. P., Jenkin, M., and Harris, L. R. 2001. Humans can use optic flow to estimate distance of travel. Vis. Res. 41, 213--219.
• 18: Rieser, J. J., Ashmead, D. H., Taylor, C. R., and Youngquist, G. 1990. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 675--689.
• 19: Sahm, C. S., Creem-Regehr, S., Thompson, W. B., and Willemsen, P. 2005. Throwing vs. walking as indicators of distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2, 1, 35--45.
• 20: Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Slater, M. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 332--339.
• 21: Slater, M., Usoh, M., and Steed, A. 1994. Depth of presence in immersive virtual environments. In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 3, 130--144.
• 22: Slater, M., Steed, A., McCarthy, J., and Marinelli, F. 1998. The virtual ante-room: Assessing presence through expectation and surprise. In Eurographics Workshop on Virtual Environments.
• 23: Steed, A., Benford, S., Dalton, N., Greenhalgh, C., MacColl, I., Randell, C., and Schnädelbach, H. 2002. Mixed-reality interfaces to immersive projection systems. In Immersive Projection Technology Workshop.
• 24: Steinicke, F., Bruder, G., Jerald, J., Frenz, H., and Lappe, M. 2008. Analyses of human sensitivity to redirected walking. In 15th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, 149--156.
• 25: Steinicke, F., Bruder, G., Steed, A., Hinrichs, K. H., and Gerlach, A. 2009. Does a gradual transition to the virtual world increase presence? In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality (VR2009), IEEE Press, 203--210.
• 26: Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 5, 560--571.
• 27: Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M., Bastos, R., Steed, A., Slater, M., and Brooks, F. 1999. Walking > Walking-in-Place > Flying, in Virtual Environments. In International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), ACM, 359--364.
• 28: Usoh, M., Catena, E., Arman, S., and Slater, M. 1999. Using presence questionaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperator in Virtual Environments 9, 5, 497--503.
• 29: Waller, D., and Richardson, A. R. 2008. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: Effects of task and available sensory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology 14, 1, 61--72.
• 30: Willemsen, P., and Gooch, A. A. 2002. Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality, 275--276.
• 31: Willemsen, P., Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S., and Thompson, W. B. 2004. The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field-of-view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2, 6.
• 32: Witmer, B. G., and Sadowski, J. W. 1998. Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors 40, i3, 489--484.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems
          Subjects: Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities

Keywords:
distance estimation, transitional environment, virtual reality