It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities

ABSTRACT

Personal energy consumption, specifically home energy consumption such as heating, cooling, and electricity, has been an important environmental and economic topic for decades. Despite the attention paid to this area, few researchers have specifically explored these issues within a community that makes up approximately 30% of U.S. households -- those below the federal poverty line. We present a study of 26 low-income households in two very different locations -- a small town in the Southern U.S. and a northerly metropolitan area. Through a photo-elicitation study and directed interviews, we explore the relationship between energy saving behaviors, external factors, and users' intrinsic values and beliefs. Most of our participants are committed to saving energy for non-financial reasons, even when not responsible for paying bills. Challenges to saving energy include safety and lack of control over the environment. We discuss how Ubicomp technologies for saving energy can address some of these challenges.

REFERENCES

• 1: Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Env Psych, 25:273--291.
• 2: Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5):888--918.
• 3: Bandura, A.(1977).Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall: NJ.
• 4: Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design: Invention & disposal, renewal & re-use. CHI'07, 503--12.
• 5: Carter, S. & Mankoff, J. (2005). When participants do the capturing: The role of media in diary studies. CHI'05, 899--908.
• 6: Chetty, M., Tran, D., & Grinter, R. (2008). Getting to green: Understanding resource consumption in the home. UbiComp'08, 242--251
• 7: Cooper, M.N., Sullivan, T.L., Punnet, S., & Berman, E. (1983). Equity and energy: Rising energy prices and the living standards of lower income Americans. Westview: CO.
• 8: Corcoran, M. 2001. Mobility, persistence, and the consequences of poverty for children: Child and adult outcomes. S. Danziger & R. Haveman, Eds., Understanding Poverty, Harvard University Press: MA, 127--161.
• 9: Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioral change. J Applied Soc. Psych. 25(5):440--462.
• 10: Dillman, D.A., Rosa, E.A., & Dillman, J.J. (1983). Life-style and home energy conservation in the U.S. J. Econ. Psych. 3:299--315.
• 11: Dunlap, R.E., & van Liere, K.D. (1978). The "New Environmental Paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Env. Ed., 9:10--19.
• 12: Fitzpatrick, G., Smith, G. (2009). Technology-Enabled Feedback on Domestic Energy Consumption: Articulating a Set of Design Concerns. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(1): 37--44.
• 13: Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., & Landay, J.A. (2009). UbiGreen: Investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. CHI'09, 1043--1052.
• 14: Gardner, G. & Stern, P. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://www.environment magazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202008/~gardner-stern-full.html
• 15: Gersick, C.J.G., & Hackman, J.R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1):65--97.
• 16: Graybiel, A. (2000). The basal ganglia. Current Biology, 10(14):R509--511.
• 17: Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J.D., & Grinter, R.E. (2008). EatWell: Sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. CSCW'08, 87--95.
• 18: Haines, V., Mitchell, V., Cooper, C., & Maguire, M. (2007). Probing user values in the home environment within a technology driven Smart Home project. PUC, 11(5):349--359.
• 19: Horrigan, J. B. & Smith, A. (2007). Home broadband adoption 2007. Pew Internet and the American Life Project.
• 20: Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behavior and behavioral change, Sustainable Development Research Network. Policy Studies Institute, London.
• 21: James, R.N. & Sharpe, D.L. (2009). The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2):218--238.
• 22: Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior Env Ed Res, 8:239--252.
• 23: Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2008). Saving energy at home and on the road: A survey of Americans' energy saving behaviors, intentions, motivations, and barriers. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale project on Climate Change: CT. http://environment.yale.edu/uploads/~SavingEnergy.pdf
• 24: Martin, N. (2008). Habit: the 95% of behavior marketers ignore. First edition. FT Press: NJ.
• 25: NC City Data. Viewed Online 04/17/2009. URL not provided to preserve participant anonymity.
• 26: Population Finder. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://2010.census. gov/2010census/
• 27: Ronis, D., Yates, J., Kirscht. J.P., (1989). Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler, & A.G. Greenwald, Eds., Attitude structure and function, Lawrence Erlbaum: NJ, 213--239.
• 28: Shui, B. (2002). Consumer lifestyles approach: A paradigm for understanding the role of consumers in energy use and environmental impacts. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
• 29: Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with "green consumerism." Social Psych. Quarterly, 55:388--399.
• 30: Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour, J Social Issues 56(3):407--424.
• 31: Stern, P. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. The American Psychologist, 47(10):1224--1232.
• 32: Sullivan, N. (2008). Cell phones provide significant economic gains for low-income American households. A review of literature and data from two new surveys. Viewed on 4/17/2009. http://newmilleniumresearch.org/archive/Sullivan_Report_032608.pdf
• 33: Taylor, P., Funk, C., & Clark, A. (2006). Americans and social trust: Who, where and why. Pew Research Center. http://pewsocialtrends.org/pubs/414/americans-and-social-trust-who-where-and-why
• 34: Text Analysis Markup System (TAMS) Analyzer. Written by M. Weinstein. http://tamsys.sourceforge.net/
• 35: Triandis, H.C. (1977). Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• 36: U.S. Census Bureau Newsroom (2009). Facts for features. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013157.html
• 37: U.S. Census 2006 Economic Survey (2007). Income data. Viewed 04/17/2009 http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032007/~hhinc/new06_000.htm
• 38: U.S. Department of Energy (2006). Annual energy review 2005. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC DOE/EIA-0384.
• 39: Van Raaij, W.F. & Verhallen, Th.M.M., (1983). A behavioral model of residential energy use. J. Econ. Psych. 3:39--63.
• 40: Weatherbase (2009). Viewed 04/17/2009: http://www.weather base.com
• 41: Weber, C. & H.S. Matthews (2007). Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecol. Econ., 66(2-3):379--391.
• 42: Woodruff, A. Augustin, S., & Foucault, B.E. (2007). Sabbath day home automation: It's like mixing technology and religion. CHI '07, 527--536.
• 43: Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., & Augustin, S., (2007). A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. CHI'07. 313--322.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.m Miscellaneous

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation

Keywords:
domestic computing, low-income, sustainability