Encountering SenseCam: personal recording technologies in everyday life

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a study of responses to the idea of being recorded by a ubicomp recording technology called SenseCam. This study focused on real-life situations in two North American and two European locations. We present the findings of this study and their implications, specifically how those who might be recorded perceive and react to SenseCam. We describe what system parameters, social processes, and policies are required to meet the needs of both the primary users and these secondary stakeholders and how being situated within a particular locale can influence responses. Our results indicate that people would tolerate potential incursions from SenseCam for particular purposes. Furthermore, they would typically prefer to be informed about and to consent to recording as well as to grant permission before any data is shared. These preferences, however, are unlikely to instigate a request for deletion or other action on their part. These results inform future design of recording technologies like SenseCam and provide a broader understanding of how ubicomp technologies might be taken up across different cultural and political regions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Abowd, G.D., Hayes, G.R., Iachello, G., Kientz, J.A., Patel, S.N., Stevens, M.M. and Truong, K.N. Prototypes and Paratypes: Designing Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4, 4 (2005). 67--73.
• 2: Ahern, S., Eckles, D., Good, N., King, S., Naaman, M., Nair, R. Over-exposed?: Privacy Patterns and Considerations in Online and Mobile Photo Sharing. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 357--366
• 3: Barreau, D., Crystal, A., Greenberg, J., Sharma, A., Conway, M., Oberlin, J., Shoffner, M. and Seiberling, S. Augmenting Memory for Student Learning: Designing a Context-Aware Capture System for Biology Education, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43(1):251--251, October 2007.
• 4: Besmer, A. and Richter Lipford, H. Privacy Perceptions of Photo Sharing in Facebook. In Proc. SOUPS 2008, ACM Press (2008)
• 5: Buchenau, M. and Suri, J.F. Experience Prototyping. In Proc. DIS 2000, ACM Press (2000), 424--433.
• 6: Cohen, J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37--48 (1960).
• 7: Consolvo, S. and Walker, M. Using the Experience Sampling Method to Evaluate Ubicomp Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2, 2 (2003), 24--31.
• 8: Dixon, J., Levine, M., and McAuley, R. Street Drinking Legislation, CCTV, and Public Space: Exploring Attitudes Towards Public Order Measures. Home Office Report, March 2007.
• 9: Friedman, B. Value-Sensitive Design. Interactions 3, 6 (Dec. 1996), 16--23.
• 10: Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Hagman, J., Severson, R.L., and Gill, B. The Watcher and the Watched: Social Judgments About Privacy in a Public Place. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 21, 2 (May. 2006), 235--272.
• 11: Gemmell, J., Williams, L., Wood, K., Lueder, R. and Bell, G. Passive Capture and Ensuing Issues for a Personal Lifetime Store. In Proc. CARPE 2004, ACM Press (2004), 48--55.
• 12: Hayes, G.R., Shehan, E., Iachello, G., Patel, S.N., Grimes, A., Adowd, G.D., and Truong, K.N. Physical, Social, and Experiential Knowledge in Pervasive Computing Environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6, 4 (2007), 56--63.
• 13: Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., Smyth, G., Kapur, N. and Wood, K. SenseCam: A Retrospective Memory Aid. In Proc. UbiComp 2006, Springer-Verlag (2006), 177--193.
• 14: Honess, T. and Charman, E. Closed Circuit Television in Public Places: Its Acceptability and Perceived Effectiveness. London: Home Office Police Department, (1992).
• 15: Iachello, G., Truong, K.N., Abowd, G.D., Hayes, G.R. and Stevens, M. Prototyping and Sampling Experience to Evaluate Ubiquitous Computing Privacy in the Real World. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1009--1018.
• 16: Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. The Measurement of Observer Agreements for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 1 (1977), 159--174.
• 17: Massimi, M., Truong, K.N., Dearman, D., Hayes, G.R. Understanding Recording Technologies in Everyday Life. Under review at IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2009.
• 18: Miller, A.D. and Edwards, W.K. Give and Take: A Study of Consumer Photo-sharing Culture and Practice. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 347--356.
• 19: Price, B.A., Adam, K., and Nuseibeh, B. Keeping Ubiquitous Computing to Yourself: A Practical Model for User Control of Privacy. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 63, 1-2 (2005), 228--253.
• 20: Sellen, A.J., Fogg, A., Aitken, M., Hodges, S., Rother, C. and Wood, K. Do Life-logging Technologies Support Memory for the Past? An Experimental Study Using Sensecam. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 81--90.
• 21: Stearns PN. Fat History: Bodies and Beauty in the Modern West. New York: New York Univ. Press (1997).
• 22: Tjoa, A., Andjomshoaa, A., and Karim, S.. Exploiting SenseCam for Helping the Blind in Business Negotiations, Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Springer, p. 1147--1154 (2006).
• 23: Truong, K., Patel, S., Summet, J. and Abowd, G., Preventing Camera Recording by Designing a Capture-Resistant Environment. In Proc. UbiComp 2005, Springer-Verlag (2005), 73--86.
• 24: Van House, N.A. Flickr and Public Image-sharing: Distant Closeness and Photo Exhibition. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 2717--2722.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.2 Social Issues

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.8 PERSONAL COMPUTING
      K.8.m Miscellaneous

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
experience sampling, paratyping, privacy, sensecam