ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scaling laws for data-centric storage and querying in wireless sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (606 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 4  (August 2009) table of contents
Pages 1242-1255  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Joon Ahn  Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Bhaskar Krishnamachari  Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 40,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2008.2009220

ABSTRACT

We use a constrained optimization framework to derive scaling laws for data-centric storage and querying in wireless sensor networks. We consider both unstructured sensor networks, which use blind sequential search for querying, and structured sensor networks, which use efficient hash-based querying. We find that the scalability of a sensor network's performance depends upon whether the increase in energy and storage resources with more nodes is outweighed by the concomitant application-specific increase in event and query loads. We derive conditions that determine: 1) whether the energy requirement per node grows without bound with the network size for a fixed-duration deployment, 2) whether there exists a maximum network size that can be operated for a specified duration on a fixed energy budget, and 3) whether the network lifetime increases or decreases with the size of the network for a fixed energy budget. An interesting finding of this work is that three-dimensional (3D) uniform deployments are inherently more scalable than two-dimensional (2D) uniform deployments, which in turn are more scalable than one-dimensional (1D) uniform deployments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "The capacity of wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, Mar. 2000.
 
4
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "Internets in the sky: Capacity of 3D wireless networks," in Proc. 39th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 2000, vol. 3, pp. 2290-2295.
 
5
L.-L. Xie and P. R. Kumar, "A network information theory for wireless communication: Scaling laws and optimal operation," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 748-767, May 2004.
 
6
O. Leveque and I. E. Telatar, "Information-theoretic upper bounds on the capacity of large extended ad hoc wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 858-865, Mar. 2005.
 
7
O. Leveque and E. Preissmann, "Scaling laws for one-dimensional ad hoc wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3987-3991, Nov. 2005.
8
9
 
10
W. B. Heinzelman, A. P. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, "An application- specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks," Wireless Commun., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 660-670, Oct. 2002.
 
11
O. Younis and S. Fahmy, "Distributed clustering in ad-hoc sensor networks: A hybrid, energy-efficient approach," in Proc. 23rd IEEE INFOCOM , Mar. 7-11, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 640-640.
12
 
13
Z. Hu and B. Li, "Fundamental performance limits of wireless sensor networks," in Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Y. Xiao and Y. Pan, Eds. Commack, NY: Nova, 2004.
 
14
M. Bhardwaj and A. P. Chandrakasan, "Bounding the lifetime of sensor networks via optimal role assignments," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, New York, Jun. 2002, online.
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
N. Trigoni, Y. Yao, A. Demers, J. Gehrke, and R. Rajaraman, "Hybrid push-pull query processing for sensor networks," in Proc. GI-Conf. Informatik, Workshop on Sensor Netw., Berlin, Germany, Sep. 2004, pp. 370-374.
 
19
S. Shakkottai, "Asymptotics of query strategies over a sensor network," in IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004, online.
20
 
21
M. D. Penrose, "The longest edge or the random minimal spanning tree," Ann. Appl. Probability, vol. 7, pp. 340-361, 1997.
 
22
M. D. Penrose, "A strong law for the longest edge of the minimal spanning tree," Ann. Probability, vol. 27, pp. 246-260, 1999.
 
23
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks," in Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications, W. H. Fleming, W. M. McEneany, G. Yin, and Q. Zhang, Eds. Boston, MA: Birkhauser, 1998, p. 547.566.
24
 
25
M. Chu, H. Haussecker, and F. Zhao, "Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks," Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 293-313, Aug. 2002.
 
26
B. Krishnamachari and J. Ahn, "Optimizing data replication for expanding ring-based queries in wireless sensor networks," in Proc. WIOPT, Boston, MA, Apr. 2006, pp. 1-10.
 
27
S. Kapadia and B. Krishnamachari, "Comparative analysis of push-pull query strategies for wireless sensor networks," in Proc. DCOSS, Jun. 2006, pp. 185-201.
 
28
H. Robbins, "Remark of Stirling's formula," Amer. Math., Monthly 62, pp. 26-29, 1955.
 
29
J. Ahn and B. Krishnamachari, "Modeling search costs in wireless sensor networks," [Online]. Available: http://ceng.usc.edu/~bkrishna Workshop paper, to be published.
 
30
M. Imase and B. M. Waxman, "Dynamic Steiner tree problem," SIAM J. Discrete Math., vol. 4, pp. 369-369, 1991.