ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An economic framework for dynamic spectrum access and service pricing
Full text PdfPdf (516 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 4  (August 2009) table of contents
Pages 1200-1213  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Shamik Sengupta  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ
Mainak Chatterjee  School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 47,   Downloads (12 Months): 47,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2008.2007758

ABSTRACT

The concept of dynamic spectrum access will allow the radio spectrum to be traded in a market like scenario allowing wireless service providers (WSPs) to lease chunks of spectrum on a short-term basis. Such market mechanisms will lead to competition among WSPs where they not only compete to acquire spectrum but also attract and retain users. Currently, there is little understanding on how such a dynamic trading system will operate so as to make the system feasible under economic terms.

In this paper, we propose an economic framework that can be used to guide i) the dynamic spectrum allocation process and ii) the service pricing mechanisms that the providers can use. We propose a knapsack based auction model that dynamically allocates spectrum to the WSPs such that revenue and spectrum usage are maximized. We borrow techniques from game theory to capture the conflict of interest between WSPs and end users. A dynamic pricing strategy for the providers is also proposed. We show that even in a greedy and non-cooperative behavioral game model, it is in the best interest of the WSPs to adhere to a price and channel threshold which is a direct consequence of price equilibrium. Through simulation results, we show that the proposed auction model entices WSPs to participate in the auction, makes optimal use of the spectrum, and avoids collusion among WSPs. We demonstrate how pricing can be used as an effective tool for providing incentives to the WSPs to upgrade their network resources and offer better services.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Aazhang, J. Lilleberg, and G. Middleton, "Spectrum sharing in a cellular system," in IEEE Symp. Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications , 2004, pp. 355-359.
 
2
K. Back and J. Zender, "Auctions of divisible goods: On the rationale for the treasury," Rev. Finan. Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 733-764, 1993.
 
3
 
4
M. Buddhikot and K. Ryan, "Spectrum management in coordinated dynamic spectrum access based cellular networks," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2005, pp. 299-307.
5
 
6
E. H. Clarke, "Multipart pricing of public goods," Public Choice, vol. 11, pp. 17-33, 1971.
 
7
A. Daoud, M. Alanyali, and D. Starobinski, "Secondary pricing of spectrum in cellular CDMA networks," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2007, pp. 535-542.
 
8
S. Gandhi, C. Buragohain, L. Cao, H. Zheng, and S. Suri, "A general framework for wireless spectrum auctions," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2007, pp. 22-33.
 
9
D. Grandblaise, C. Kloeck, T. Renk, P. Bag, P. Levine, K. Moessner, J. Yang, M. Pan, and K. Zhang, "Microeconomics inspired mechanisms to manage dynamic spectrum allocation," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2007, pp. 452-461.
 
10
L. He and J. Walrand, "Pricing Internet services with multiple providers," presented at the Allerton Conf., 2003.
 
11
G. Illing and U. Kluh, Spectrum Auctions and Competition in Telecommunications . London, U.K.: The MIT Press, 2003.
 
12
Z. Ji and K. J. R. Liu, "Collusion-resistant dynamic spectrum allocation for wireless networks via pricing," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2007, pp. 187-190.
 
13
F. P. Kelly, A. K. Maulluo, and D. K. H. Tan, "Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability," J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 49, pp. 237-252, 1998.
 
14
P. Klemperer, "Auction theory: A guide to the literature," J. Econ. Surveys , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 227-286, Jul. 1999.
 
15
V. Krishna, Auction Theory, 1st ed. New York: Elsevier Press, 2002.
 
16
17
 
18
I. K. MacKie-Mason and H. R. Varian, "Pricing congestible network resources," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1141-1149, Jul. 1995.
 
19
P. Maille and B. Tuffin, "Multibid auctions for bandwidth allocation in communication networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 54-65.
 
20
 
21
G. F. Marias, "Spectrum scheduling and brokering based on QoS demands of competing WISPs," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2005, pp. 684-687.
 
22
 
23
J. F. Nash, "Equilibrium points in N-person games," Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 48-49, 1950.
 
24
 
25
D. L. Reiley, "Auctions on the Internet: What's being auctioned, and how?," J. Industrial Economics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 227-252, Sep. 2000.
 
26
 
27
N. Semret, R. R.-F. Liao, A. T. Campbell, and A. A. Lazar, "Pricing, provisioning and peering: Dynamic markets for differentiated Internet services and implications for network interconnections," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2499-2513, Dec. 2000.
 
28
S. Sengupta, M. Chatterjee, and S. Ganguly, "An economic framework for spectrum allocation and service pricing with competitive wireless service providers," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, Apr. 2007, pp. 89-98.
 
29
P. J. Seok and K. S. Rye, "Developing MVNO market scenarios and strategies through a scenario planning approach," in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2005, vol. 1, pp. 137-142.
 
30
 
31
A. P. Subramanian, H. Gupta, S. R. Das, and M. Buddhikot, "Fast spectrum allocation in coordinated dynamic spectrum access based cellular networks," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2007, pp. 320-330.
 
32
H. R. Varian, Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1992.
 
33
W. Vickrey, "Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders," J. Finance, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 8-37, Mar. 1961.
 
34
H. Wang, H. Xie, L. Qiu, A. Silberschatz, and Y. R. Yang, "Optimal ISP subscription for internet multihoming: Algorithm design and implication analysis," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2005, vol. 4, pp. 2360-2371.
 
35
W. Wang and B. Li, "Market-driven bandwidth allocation in selfish overlay networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2005, vol. 4, pp. 2578-2589.
 
36
Y. Xing and R. Chandramouli, "QoS constrained secondary spectrum sharing," in Proc. IEEE DySpan, 2005, pp. 658-661.
 
37
A. Zemlianov and G. de Veciana, "Cooperation and decision-making in a wireless multi-provider setting," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 386-397.