ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Understanding the capacity region of the Greedy maximal scheduling algorithm in multihop wireless networks
Full text PdfPdf (804 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 4  (August 2009) table of contents
Pages 1132-1145  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Changhee Joo  The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Xiaojun Lin  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Ness B. Shroff  The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 47,   Downloads (12 Months): 47,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2009.2026276

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we characterize the performance of an important class of scheduling schemes, called greedy maximal scheduling (GMS), for multihop wireless networks. While a lower bound on the throughput performance of GMS has been well known, empirical observations suggest that it is quite loose and that the performance of GMS is often close to optimal. In this paper, we provide a number of new analytic results characterizing the performance limits of GMS. We first provide an equivalent characterization of the efficiency ratio of GMS through a topological property called the local-pooling factor of the network graph. We then develop an iterative procedure to estimate the local-pooling factor under a large class of network topologies and interference models. We use these results to study the worst-case efficiency ratio of GMS on two classes of network topologies. We show how these results can be applied to tree networks to prove that GMS achieves the full capacity region in tree networks under the K-hop interference model. Then, we show that the worst-case efficiency ratio of GMS in geometric unit-disk graphs is between 1/6 and 1/3.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
L. Tassiulas and A. Ephremides, "Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximal throughput in multihop radio networks," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1936-1948, Dec. 1992.
 
2
 
3
G. Sharma, C. Joo, and N. B. Shroff, "Distributed scheduling schemes for throughput guarantees in wireless networks," in Proc. 44th Annu. Allerton Conf. Commun., Control, and Comput., Sep. 2006, pp. 1396-1405.
 
4
X. Lin and S. Rasool, "Constant-time distributed scheduling policies for ad hoc wireless networks," in IEEE CDC, Dec. 2006, pp. 1258-1263.
5
 
6
C. Joo and N. B. Shroff, "Performance of random access scheduling schemes in multi-hop wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, May 2007, pp. 19-27.
 
7
A. Gupta, X. Lin, and R. Srikant, "Low-complexity distributed scheduling algorithms for wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, May 2007, pp. 1631-1639.
8
 
9
 
10
B. Hajek and G. Sasaki, "Link scheduling in polynominal time," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 910-917, Sep. 1988.
 
11
S. Sarkar and L. Tassiulas, "End-to-end bandwidth guarantees through fair local spectrum share in wireless ad-hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE CDC, Dec. 2003, pp. 564-569.
 
12
P. Chaporkar, K. Kar, X. Luo, and S. Sarkar, "Throughput and fairness guarantees through maximal scheduling in wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 572-594, Feb. 2008.
 
13
X. Wu and R. Srikant, "Scheduling efficiency of distributed greedy scheduling algorithms in wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM , Apr. 2006, pp. 1-12.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
A. Dimakis and J. Walrand, "Sufficient conditions for stability of longest-queue-first scheduling: Second-order properties using fluid limits," Adv. Appl. Probab., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 505-521, 2006.
 
18
J.-H. Hoepman, "Simple distributed weighted matchings," Oct. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0410047v1
19
20
 
21
G. Zussman, A. Brzezinski, and E. Modiano, "Multihop local pooling for distributed throughput maximization in wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2008, pp. 1139-1147.
 
22
 
23
J. G. Dai, "On positive harris recurrence of multiclass queueing networks: A unified approach via fluid limit models," Ann. Appl. Probab., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49-77, 1995.
 
24
 
25
R. L. Cruz and A. V. Santhanam, "Optimal routing, link scheduling and power control in multi-hop wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM , San Francisco, Apr. 2003, pp. 702-711.
 
26
C. Joo, X. Lin, and N. B. Shroff, "Performance limits of greedy maximal matching in multi-hop wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE CDC, Dec. 2007, pp. 1128-1133.
 
27
C. Joo, X. Lin, and N. B. Shroff, "Understanding the capacity region of the greedy maximal scheduling algorithm in multi-hop wireless networks," Ohio State Univ., Columbus, 2008, Tech. Rep. [Online]. Available: http://www.ece.osu.edu/~cjoo
 
28
 
29
H. Balakrishnan, C. L. Barrett, V. S. A. Kumar, M. V. Marathe, and S. Thite, "The distance-2 matching problem and its relationship to the MAC-layer capacity of Ad Hoc wireless networks," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1069-1079, Aug. 2004.
 
30
 
31
C. Buragohain, S. Suri, C. Toth, and Y. Zhou, "Improved throughput bounds for interference-aware routing in wireless networks," in Proc. COCOON, 2007, pp. 210-221.