Impact of item density on magic lens interactions

ABSTRACT

We conducted a user study to investigate the effect of visual context in handheld augmented reality interfaces. A dynamic peephole interface (without visual context beyond the device display) was compared to a magic lens interface (with video see-through augmentation of external visual context). The task was to explore objects on a map and look for a specific attribute shown on the display. We tested different sizes of visual context as well as different numbers of items per area, i.e. different item densities. We found that visual context is most effective for sparse item distributions and the performance benefit decreases with increasing density. User performance in the magic lens case approaches the performance of the dynamic peephole case the more densely spaced the items are. In all conditions, subjective feedback indicates that participants generally prefer visual context over the lack thereof. The insights gained from this study are relevant for designers of mobile AR and dynamic peephole interfaces by suggesting when external visual context is most beneficial.

REFERENCES

• 1: Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., and Paull D. 2008. Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107(3), 1035--1047.
• 2: Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., and DeRose T. D. 1993. Toolglass and magic lenses: The see-through interface. In SIGGRAPH '93, 73--80. ACM.
• 3: Mehra, S., Werkhoven, P., and Worring. M. 2006. Navigating on handheld displays: Dynamic versus static peephole navigation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13(4), 448--457.
• 4: Quenée, H. and van den Bergh, H. 2004. On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43 (2004), 103--121.
• 5: Reichenbacher. T. 2001. Adaptive concepts for a mobile cartography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, Acta Geographica Sinica, 11:43--53.
• 6: Reilly, D., Rodgers, M., Argue, R. Nunes, M., and Inkpen, K. 2006. Marked-up maps: Combining paper maps and electronic information resources. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 10(4):215--226.
• 7: Rohs, M., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., and Hecht, B. 2007. Towards real-time markerless tracking of magic lenses on paper maps. Adjunct Proceedings of the 5th Intl. Conference on Pervasive Computing, 69--72.
• 8: Rohs, M., Schöning, J., Raubal, M., Essl, G., and Krüger, A. 2007. Map navigation with mobile devices: Virtual versus physical movement with and without visual context. In ICMI '07, 146--153. ACM.
• 9: Yee, K.-P. 2003. Peephole displays: Pen interaction on spatially aware handheld computers. In CHI '03, 1--8. ACM

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Input devices and strategies (e.g., mouse, touchscreen)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
camera phones, dynamic peephole, magic lens, mobile devices, small displays, visual search