ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the evaluation of Boolean operators in the extended Boolean retrieval framework
Full text PdfPdf (661 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 291 - 297  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-605-0
Authors
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/160688.160741
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The retrieval models based on the extended boolean retrieval framework, e.g., the fuzzy set model and the extended boolean model have been proposed in the past to provide the conventional boolean retrieval system with the document ranking facility. However, due to undesirable properties of evaluation formulas for the AND and OR operations, the former generates incorrect ranked output in certain cases and the latter suffers from the complexity of computation. There have been a variety of fuzzy operators to replace the evaluation formulas. In this paper we first investigate the behavioral aspects of the fuzzy operators and address important issues to affect retrieval effectiveness. We then define an operator class called positively compensatory operators giving high retrieval effectiveness, and present a pair of positively compensatory operators providing high retrieval efficiency as well as high retrieval effectiveness. All the claims are justified through experiments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Bart85
M. Bartschi, "An Overview of Information Retrieval Subjects," IEEE Computer, pp. 67- 84, 1985.
 
Book 80
A. Bookstein, "Fuzzy Requests: An Approach to Weighted Boolean Searches," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 240-247, 1980.
 
Buel81
D.A. Buell, "A General Model of Query Processing in Information Retrieval System," Information Processing & Management, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 249-262, 1981.
 
Gupt 91
 
Lee 92
J.H. Lee, M.H. Kim and Y.J. Lee, "Enhancing the Fuzzy Set Model for High Quality Document Rankings," Proceedings of the 19th Euromicro Conference, Paris, France, 337-344, 1992.
 
Lee 93
 
Rade 79
T. Radecki, "Fuzzy Set Theoretical Approach to Document Retrieval," Information Processing & Management, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 247-259, 1979.
 
Sach 76
W.M. Sachs, "An Approach to Associative Retrieval through the Theory of Fuzzy Sets," journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 27, pp. 85-87, 1976.
Salt 83
 
Salt 85
 
Salt 89
 
Wall 79
W.G. Waller and D.H. Kraft, "A Mathematical Model of a Weighted Boolean Retrieval System," Information Processing & Management, Vol. 15, pp. 235-245, 1979.
 
Wern 88
B. Werners, "Aggregation Models in Mathematical Programming," in Mathematical Models for Decision Support, G. Mitra ed., pp. 295-319, 1988.
 
Zade 65
L.A. Zadeh, "Fuzzy Sets," Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 338-353, 1965.
 
Zimm 80
H.J. Zimmermann and P. Zysno, "Latent Connectives in Human Decision Making," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 37-51, 1980.
 
Zimm 91

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Joon Ho Lee: colleagues
Won Yong Kin: colleagues
Myoung Ho Kim: colleagues
Yoon Joon Lee: colleagues