ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Viewing morphology as an inference process
Full text PdfPdf (1.11 MB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 191 - 202  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-605-0
Author
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 78
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/160688.160718
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Morphology is the area of linguistics concerned with the internal structure of words. Information Retrieval has generally not paid much attention to word structure, other than to account for some of the variability in word forms via the use of stemmers. This paper will describe our experiments to determine the importance of morphology, and the effect that it has on performance. We will also describe the role of morphological analysis in word sense disambiguation, and in identifying lexical semantic relationships in a machine-readable dictionary. We will first provide a brief overview of morphological phenomena, and then describe the experiments themselves.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Aichison 88
Aichison J, "Reproductive Furniture and Extinguished Professors", in Language Topics. An International Collection of Papers by Colleagues, Students, and Admirers of Professor Michael Halliday, R. Steele and T. Threadgold (eds), Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Vol. II, pp. 3-14, 1988.
 
Badecker and Caramazza 89
Badecker W and Caramazza A, "A Lexical Distinction Between Inflection and Derivation", Linguistic inquiry, Vol. 20(1), pp. 108-110, Winter, 1989.
 
Choueka 92
Choueka Y, "Responsa: An Operational Full-Text Retrieval System with Linguistic Components for Large Corpora", in Computational Lezicology and Lezicogvaphy: a Volume in Honor of B. Quemada, A. Zampoli (ed), Giardini Press, Pisa, 1992.
 
Church 88
Harman 88
 
Harman 91
Harman D, "How Effective is Suffixing?", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 42(1), pp. 7-15, 1991.
 
Krovetz 91
Krovetz R, "Lexical Acquisition and Information Retrieval", in Lez,cal Acquisition: Ezploiting On-Line Resources to Build a Lezicon, Uri Zernik (ed), Lawrence Erlbaum Pub., pp. 45-64, 1991.
Krovetz 92a
 
Krovetz 92b
Lesk 86
 
Lovins 68
Lovins J, "Development of a Stemming Algorithm", Mechanical Translation and Computational Linguistics, Vol. 11, pp. 22-31, March 1968.
 
Marchand 63
Marchand H, "On a Question of Contrary Analysis with Derivational Connected but Morphologically Uncharacterized Words", English Studies, 44, pp. 176-187, 1963
 
Popovic and Willet 92
Popovic M and Willet P, "The Effectiveness of Stemming for Natural Language Access to Slovene Textual Data", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 384-390, 1992.
 
Porter 80
Porter M, "An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping", Program, Vol. 14(3), pp. 130-137, 1980.
 
Stevens 70
Stevens R, Automatic In&zing: A Sta~eof-the-Art Report, NDI Monograph 91, 1970.

CITED BY  78