ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The identification of important concepts in highly structured technical papers
Full text PdfPdf (857 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 69 - 78  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-605-0
Authors
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/160688.160696
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Automatic abstracting, typically based on extraction of important sentences from a text, has been treated as a largely separate task from automatic indexing. This paper describes an approach in which the indexing and abstracting tasks are effectively combined. It is applicable to highly structured empirical research papers, whose content can be organised using a semantic frame. During a scan of a source text, stylistic clues and constructs are used for extracting candidate fillers for the various slots in the frame. Subsequently, an actual concept name is chosen for each slot by comparing the various candidates and their weights.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baxendale, P.B. 1958: "Man-made index for technical literature an experiment", IBM Journal of Research & Development 2(4), 354-361.
 
2
DeJong, G. 1982: "An overview of the FRUMP system", in W.G.Lelmert & M.H.Ringle (eds.), Strategies for Natural Language Processing, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3
 
4
Hahn, U. I989: "Making understanders out of parsers: semantically driven parsing as a key concept for realistic text understanding applications", International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 4(3), 345-385.
 
5
 
6
Jones, P.A. & Paice, C.D. 1992: "A 'select-and-generate' approach to automatic abstracting", 14th British Computer Society Information Retrieval Colloquium, Lancaster, March 1992.
 
7
KLrcz, J.G. 1991: "The rhetorical structure of scientific articles: the case for argumentational analysis in information retrieval", Journal of Documentation 47(4), 354-372.
 
8
 
9
Luhn, H.P. 1958: "The automatic creation of literature abstracts", IBM Journal of Research & Development 2(2), 159-165.
 
10
 
11
Paice, C.D. & Husk, G.D. 1987: "Towards the automatic recognition of anaphoric features in English text: the impersonal pronoun it", Computer Speech & Language 2, 109-132.
 
12
 
13
Paice, C.D. 1991: "The rhetorical structure of expository texts", Proceedings of the Informatics 11 conference, York, March 20-22, 1991.
 
14
Pollock, J.J. & Zamora, A. 1975: "Automatic abstracting research at the Chemical Abstracts Service", Journal of Chemical Information & Computer Science 15(4), 226- 232.
 
15
 
16
Rush, J.E., Salvador, R. & Zamora, A. 1971: "Automatic abstracting and indexing. II. Production of indicative abstracts by application of contextual inference and syntactic coherence criteria", Journal of the American Society for Information Science 22(3), 260-274.
 
17
Skorokhod'ko, E.F. 1972: "Adaptive method of automatic abstracting and indexing", Information Processing 71, North Holland; pp.1179-1182,
 
18
Dijk, T.A. 1980: Macrostructures, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; chapter 3.
 
19

CITED BY  32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chris D. Paice: colleagues
Paul A. Jones: colleagues