ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Logic-based verification of technical documentation
Full text PdfPdf (390 KB)
Source
Document Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM symposium on Document engineering table of contents
Munich, Germany
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: Demo's and posters table of contents
Pages 251-252  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-575-8
Authors
Christian Schönberg  University of Passau, Passau, Germany
Franz Weitl  University of Passau, Passau, Germany
Mirjana Jakšić  University of Passau, Passau, Germany
Burkhard Freitag  University of Passau, Passau, Germany
Sponsors
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1600193.1600250
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Checking the content coherence of digital documents is the purpose of the Verdikt system which can be applied to different domains and document types including technical documentation, e-learning documents, and web pages. An expressive temporal description logic allows for the specification of content consistency criteria along document paths. Whether the document conforms to the specification can then be verified by applying a model checker. In case of specification violations, the model checker provides counterexamples, locating errors in the document precisely. Based on a sample technical documentation in the form of a web document, the general verification process and its effectiveness, efficiency, and usability are demonstrated.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Resource Description Framework (RDF) Concepts and Abstract Syntax, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/. Visited 07/2009.
 
2
S. Bechhofer, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www. w3.org/TR/owl-ref/. Visited 07/2009.
 
3
A. Cimatti, E. Clarke, E. Giunchiglia, F. Giunchiglia, M. Pistore, M. Roveri, R. Sebastiani, and A. Tacchella. NuSMV 2: An opensource tool for symbolic model checking. In Proc. of CAV 02, volume 2404 of LNCS. Springer, 2002.
 
4
M. Jakšić and B. Freitag. Temporal patterns for document verification. Technical Report MIP-0805, University of Passau, 2008.
 
5
M. Jakšić and B. Freitag. Evaluation der Methode zur Nutzerunterstützung. Technical Report MIP-0906, University of Passau, Germany, 2009.
 
6
R. Jelliffe. The schematron assertion language 1.6. http://xml.ascc.net/resource/schematron/Schematron2000.html, 2002. Visited 07/2009.
 
7
C. Nentwich, L. Capra, W. Emmerich, and A. Finkelstein. xlinkit: a consistency checking and smart link generation service. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 2(2):151--185, 2002.
 
8
C. Schönberg and B. Freitag. Extracting and storing document metadata. Technical Report MIP-0907, University of Passau, 2009.
 
9
C. Schönberg, M. Jakšić, F. Weitl, and B. Freitag. Verification of web-content: A case study on technical documentation. In Proc. of the 5th International Workshop on Automated Specification and Verification of Web Systems (WWV 09), Linz, Austria, 2009.
 
10
F. Weitl. Document Verification with Temporal Description Logics. PhD thesis, Univ. of Passau, 2008.
 
11
F. Weitl, M. Jaksic, and B. Freitag. Towards the automated verification of semi-structured documents. Journal of Data & Knowledge Engineering, 68:292--317, 2009.