ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Aesthetic measure of alignment and regularity
Full text PdfPdf (1.12 MB)
Source
Document Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM symposium on Document engineering table of contents
Munich, Germany
SESSION: Document analysis (I) table of contents
Pages 56-65  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-575-8
Authors
Helen Y. Balinsky  Hewlett-Packard Labs, Bristol, United Kingdom
Anthony J. Wiley  Hewlett-Packard Labs, Bristol, United Kingdom
Matthew C. Roberts  University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1600193.1600207
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

To be effective as communications or sales tools, documents that are personalized and customized for each customer must be visually appealing and aesthetically pleasing. Producing perhaps millions of unique versions of essentially the same document not only presents challenges to the printing process but also disrupts the standard quality control procedures. The quality of the alignment in each document can easily distinguish professionally looking documents from amateur designs and some computer generated layouts. A multicomponent measure of document alignment and regularity, derived directly from designer knowledge, is developed and presented in computable form. The measure includes: edge quality, page connectivity, grid regularity and alignment statistics. It is clear that these components may have different levels of importance, relevance and acceptability for various document types and classes, thus the proposed measure should always be evaluated against the requirements of the desired class of documents.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Zakia. Perception and imaging. Focal Press, 2rd edition, 2001.
 
2
D. Ngo, L. Teo, J. Byrne. A Mathematical Theory of Interface Aesthetics. In Knowledge and Information Systems, Volume 4, Issue 1, p. 46, 2002.
 
3
S. Harrington, J. Naveda, R. Jones. Aesthetic Measures for Automated Document Layout. In DocEng '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Document engineering, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 2005. ACM.
 
4
G. Kanizsa. Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception Praeger, New York, 1979.
 
5
H. Chao, J. Fan. Layout and content extraction for pdf documents. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Document Analysis Systems VI, pages 213--224, Berlin / Heidelberg, 2004. Springer-Verlag.
 
6
H. Balinsky, A. Wiley, M. Rhodes, A. Abdul-Rahman. Automated Repurposing of Implicitly Structured Documents. In DocEng'08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Document engineering, pp. 42--51, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2008. ACM.
 
7
P. Hough. Method and Means for Recognizing Complex Patterns. U.S. Patent 3,069,654, 1962.
 
8
R. Duda, P. Hart. Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures. Communications of the ACM, v.15, pp. 11--15, 1972. ACM.
 
9
R. Carter, B. Day, P. B. Meggs. Typographic Design: Form and Communication. Wiley, 3rd edition, 2002.