ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using an edge-dual graph and k-connectivity to identify strong connections in social networks
Full text PdfPdf (1.52 MB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on XX table of contents
Auburn, Alabama
SESSION: Social networks table of contents
Pages 475-480  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-105-7
Authors
Li Ding  The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
Brandon Dixon  The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1593105.1593230
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

How close two entities are in social network is a key factor of SNA (Social Network Analysis). Recent studies of social networks contain a large number of entities and huge number of relations/connections in the networks. Efficiently and accurately analyzing relationships in the network is important component of SNA, especially for law enforcement. In this paper we propose using the edge-dual graph to transform the traditional social network graph to a relation context oriented graph and using modified k-connectivity concepts to evaluate the robustness of the relations. We also describe an implementation of a system based on a 450GB data source, involving 5 million people in Alabama. We use this large scale implementation to evaluate the performance and correctness of the proposal. Our evaluation suggests that using this relation context oriented technology will help to construct a more accurate social network.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Wasserman, S and Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. 4--10
 
2
 
3
 
4
Kossinets, G and Watts, D. J. 2006. Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network. Science, vol. 311 (Jan, 2006), 88--90.
 
5
 
6
Goldberg, H. G and Wong, R. W. H. 1998. Restructuring databases for knowledge discovery by consolidation and link information. In Proceedings of 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Link Analysis (Menlo Park, CA, 1998).
 
7
Goldberg, H. G and Wong, R. W. H. 1998. Restructuring transactional data for link analysis in the FinCen AI system. In Proceedings of 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Link Analysis (Menlo Park, CA, 1998).
 
8
 
9
 
10
Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, vol. 393 (Jun, 1998), 440--442.
 
11
Barabasi, A. L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A. and Vicsek, T. 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A 311, (3--4) (2002), 590--614.
 
12
Harary, F. 1969. Graph Theory. 45--46
 
13
Moody, J. and White, D. R. 2003. Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups. American Sociological Review, vol. 68 (2003), 103--127.
 
14
Clark, J. 1991. A first look at graph theory. World Scientific, 1991.
 
15
 
16
Web site: http://www.jgraph.com/