| Heavyweight or lightweight: a process selection guide for developing grid software |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.15 MB)
|
| Source
|
ACM Southeast Regional Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on XX
table of contents
Auburn, Alabama
SESSION: Software engineering
table of contents
Pages 99-102
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-105-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Cong Liu
|
Auburn University, Shelby Center Auburn, AL
|
|
David Umphress
|
Auburn University, Shelby Center Auburn, AL
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22, Downloads (12 Months): 41, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Along with the advances in wide-area network technologies and computer hardware, the increasing availability of powerful computers and high speed networks are changing the high performance computing paradigm today. Recent related research has led to the emergence of a new paradigm known as grid computing. A major motivation of grid computing is to aggregate the power of widely distributed resources to provide services to users. Several unique characteristics of this paradigm make the development of grid software more challenging. In order to develop grid-aware applications, software engineering principles (e.g. software process, life-cycle model) for building conventional software must be adopted to cope with these challenges. Nowadays two kinds of software processes are frequently mentioned: heavyweight and lightweight. In this paper, we address the issues of comparing the two kinds of processes and selecting the better one for developing grid software. We choose to examine two well-known software processes: IEEE 1074 [6] and Extreme Programming [1], which respectively represents heavyweight process and lightweight process. They are first examined in detail and a comparison between them is conducted. Then we present a selection guide to choose the better methodology for a grid software project. Our analysis shows that lightweight software processes such as XP are more suitable for developing grid software.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Cockburn, A. and Highsmith, J. 2001 The People Factor. In Software Management, 131--133.
|
| |
3
|
Foreman, J., Gross, J., Rosenstein, R., Fisher, D., and Brune, D. 2007 C4 Software Technology Reference Guide-A Prototype. Handbook CMU/SEI-97-HB-001.
|
| |
4
|
Foster, I. and Kesselman C. 2003 The Grid2. Morgan Kauffmann Publishers.
|
| |
5
|
GridMATHEMATICA Introduction {Online}. Available: http://www.wolfram.com/products/gridmathematica {Accessed Nov. 5, 2007}
|
| |
6
|
IEEE 1074 Description {Online}. Available: http://standards.ieee.org/reading/ieee/std_public/description/se/1074-1997_desc.html {Accessed Nov. 10, 2007}.
|
| |
7
|
IEEE 1074 Standards for Developing Life Cycle Processes {Online}.Available: http://www.augustana.ca/~mohrj/courses/2005.fall/csc220/1ecture_notes/lifecycle.html {Accessed Nov. 10, 2007}.
|
| |
8
|
Metacomputing Introduction {Online}. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacomputing {Accessed Oct. 4, 2007}.
|
| |
9
|
Metacomputing Capabilities {Online}. Available: http://www.hpti.com/tblTopicsHomeTemplate.asp?ID=114 {Accessed Nov. 8, 2007}.
|
| |
10
|
Oracle Application Server 10g {Online}. Available: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/index.html {Accessed Nov. 8, 2007}.
|
| |
11
|
Software Life Cycle Models {Online}. Available: http://www.levela.com/software_life_cycles_swdoc.htm {Accessed Nov. 8, 2007}.
|
| |
12
|
TurboWorx Enterprise Introduction {Online}. Available: http://www.gridtoday.com/04/0419/103077.html {Accessed Nov. 8, 2007}.
|
| |
13
|
Umphress D. 2007 Process Redux. COMP 6700 Software Process Course Material, Auburn University.
|
|