ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A consistent hierarchical representation for vector data
Full text PdfPdf (979 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques archive
Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques table of contents
Pages: 197 - 206  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-89791-196-2
Also published in ...
Authors
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 22
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/15922.15908
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A consistent hierarchical data structure for the representation of vector data is presented. It makes use of a concept termed a line segment fragment to prevent data degradation under splitting or clipping of vector primitives. This means that the insertion and subsequent deletion (and vice versa) of a vector leaves the data unchanged. Vectors are represented exactly and not as digital approximations. The data is dynamically organized by use of simple probabilistic splitting and merging rules. The use of the structure for implementing a geographic information system is described. Algorithms for constructing and manipulating the structure are provided. Results of empirical tests comparing the structure to other representations in the literature are given.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
{Carl85}- I. Carlbom, I. Chakravurty, and D. Vanderschel, A hierarchical data structure for representing the spatial decomposition of 3-D objects, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applicalions 5, 4(April 1985), 24-31.
4
 
5
{Fink74} - B.A. Finkel and J.L. Bentley, Quad trees: a data structure for retrievM on composite keys, Acta Information 4, 1(1974), 1-9.
 
6
{Fuji85} - K. Fujimura and T.L. Kunii, A hierarchical space indexing method, Proceedings of Computer Graphics '85, Tokyo, 1985, T1-4, 1-14.
7
 
8
{Hunt79} - G.M. Hunter and K. Steiglilz, Operations on images using quad trees, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Tntelligence 1, 2(April 1979), 145-153.
 
9
{Klin71}- A. Klinger, Patterns and Search Statistics, in Optimizing Methods in Statistics, J.S. Rustagi, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1971, 303-337.
 
10
{Rose83} - A. Rosenfeld, H. Samet, C. Shaffer, and R.E. Webber, Application of hierarchical data structures to geographical information systems phase II, Computer Science TR 1327, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, September 1983.
 
11
{Same84a}- H. Samet and R.E. Webber, On encoding boundaries with quadtrees, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6,'3(May 1984), 365-369.
12
 
13
{Same85a} H. Samet and M. Tamminen, Efficient component, labeling of images of arbit, rary dimension, Computer Science TR-1480, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, February 1985.
 
14
{Same85b} H. Sumet., C.A. Shuffer, and R.E. Webber, The segment quadtree: a linear quadtree-based representation for linear features, Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 85, San Francisco, June 1985, 385-389.
15
 
16
{Same85d}- H. Samet, A. Rosenfcld, C.A. Shaffer, B.C. Nelson, Y-G. Huang, and K. Fujimura, Appiication of hierrchical data structures to geographic information systems: phase IV, Computer Science TR-1578, University of Maryland, CoIlege Park, MD, December 1985.
 
17
{Shne81}- M. Shneier, Calculations of geometric properties using quadtrees, Computer Graphics and Image Processing 16, 3(July 1981), 296-302.
 
18
{Tamm83} - M. Tamminen, Performance analysis of cell based geometric file organizations, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 24, 2(November 1983), 168-181.

CITED BY  22

Collaborative Colleagues:
Randal C. Nelson: colleagues
Hanan Samet: colleagues