ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Legal knowledge acquisition using case-based reasoning and model inference
Full text PdfPdf (485 KB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Pages: 212 - 217  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-606-9
Authors
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/158976.159003
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Although Case-Based Reasoning comes out in order to solve knowledge acquisition bottleneck, a case structure acquisition bottleneck has emerged, superseding it. Because we cannot decide an appropriate case structure in advance, a framework for CBR should be able to improve a case structure dynamically, collecting and analyzing cases. Here is discussed a new framework for knowledge acquisition using CBR and model inference. Model Inference tries to obtain new descriptors(predicates) with interaction of a domain expert, regarding the predicate as the slots that compose a case structure, with an eye to the function of theoretical term generation. The framework has two features: (1) CBR obtains a more suitable group of slots (a case structure) incrementally through cooperation with model inference, and (2) model inference with theoretical term capability discovers the rules which deal with a given task better. Furthermore, we evaluate the feasibility of the framework by implementing it to deal with law interpretation and certify two features with the framework.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S.Muggleton editor: Inductive Logic Programming, Academic Press(1992)
 
2
S.Muggleton, W.Buntine : Machine Invention of First-order Predicates by Inverting Resolution, Proc. 5th ICML, pp.339-352 (1988)
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
H.Tubaki : Application of analogy for the Civil Law, Journal for Law Vo162, No7, pp.72-77 (1987)

Collaborative Colleagues:
Takahira Yamaguti: colleagues
Masaki Kurematsu: colleagues