ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Legal interpretation in expert systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.19 MB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Pages: 90 - 99  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-606-9
Authors
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/158976.158988
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Aiello 88
Aiello, L. and Levi, G., "The Uses of Metaknowledge in AI Systems, Meta-Level Architectures and Reflexion (eds Maes and Nardi), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1988, pp. 243-254.
 
Ashley 90
Ashley, K.D., Modeling Legal Argument, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1990.
Bench-Capon 87
 
Bench-Capon 92
Bench-Capon, T.J.M and Coenen, F.P., "Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems", AI and Law Journal 1 (1992) 1, pp. 65-86.
 
Bing 91
Bing, J., "Rules and Representaion; Interaction between Legal Knowledge Based Systems and the General Theory of Legal Rules", Nordic Studies in Information Technology and Law (ed. Blume), Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1991, pp. 95-119.
 
Bourcier 90
Bourcier, D., "L'interpr~ation dans les syst~mes experts juridiques: de l'intime conviction la formalisation des r~gles', Interpretation in the Humanities: Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence (eds Ennals and Gardin), London: British Library Board, 1990, pp. 215-228.
 
Branting 91
Bratley 91
Breuker 91
 
Capper 88
Capper, P. and Susskind, R.E., Latent Damage Law- The Expert System, London: Butterworths, 1988.
 
Côté 91
CSt~, P.-A., The Interpretation of Legislation in Canada, Second Edition, Cowansville Quebec: ~ditions Yvon Blais, 1991; (Translation of "Interpretation des lois, 2e ~dition, 1990).
 
Gardner 87
 
Gordon 91
 
Guidotti 92
Guidotti, P., Mariani, P., Sardu G. and Tiscornia, D. <<Meta-level Reasoning- The Design of a System to Handle Legal Knowledge Bases, Settimo Convegno Sulla Programmazione Logica - GULP'92, Tremezzo, 1992, pp. 445-459.
 
Hamfelt 90
Hamfelt, A., Building Modular Legal Knowledge Systems. The Multilevel Structure of Legal Knowledge and its Representation, Stockholm: The Swedish Institure of Law and Informatics Research, IRi-Rapport 1990:2, 1990.
 
Hamfelt 92
Hamfelt, A., Metalogic Representation of Multilayered Knowledge, Phd Thesis, Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1992.
 
Kowalski 90
Kowalski, R.A. and Sergot, M.J., "The Use of Logical Models in Legal Problem Solving", Ratio Juris 3 (1990), pp. 201-218.
 
Lenat 83
Lenat, D., Davis, R., Doyle, J., Genesereth, M., Goldstein, I. and Schrobe, H., "Reasoning about Reasoning", Building Expert Systems (eds Hayes- Roth, Waterman and Lenat), Reading MA; Addison- Wesley, 1983, pp. 219 239.
 
MacCormick 91
MacCormick, D.N. and Summers, S.R., Interpreting Statutes--A Comparative Study, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, 1991.
 
Mariani 91
Mariani, P. and Tiscornia, D. "Elements for representation of law: types and levels", Les Annales de I'{RETIJ, Montpellier: IRETIJ, 1991, 12 p.
 
Maxwell 69
Maxwell On The Interpretation of Statutes, 12th Edition (by P.St.J. Langan), London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1969.
 
McCarty 83
McCarty, L.T., ''Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Problems and Prospects", Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 9 (1983), pp. 265-294.
McCarty 91
Oskamp 89
Prakken 91
Rissland 87
Rissland 89
 
Routen 91
 
Schild 90
Schild, U.J., "Expert Systems, Meta-rules and quasi-legal domains", Dixi~mes Journdes internationales- Les syst~mes expert et leurs applications, Avignon 1990, Paris: EC2, vol. 2, pp. 703- 716.
Sergot 86
 
Skalak 92
Skalak, B.D. and Rissland, E.L, "Arguments and Cases: An Inevitable Intertwining", Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1992), 1, pp. 3-44.
 
Smith 87
Smith, J.C. and Deedman, C., "'The Application of Expert Systems Technology to Case- Based Law", The First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Boston,_ 1987, New York: ACM Press, pp. 84-93.
 
Susskind 87
 
van Harmelen 89
 
Walker 91
 
Wróblewski 84
Wr6blewski, J., "Paradigms of Justifying Legal Decisions", Theory of Legal Science (eds Peczenik, Lindahl and Roermund), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984, pp. 253-273.
 
Wróblewski 88
Wr6blewski, J., 'Interpretation', Dictionnaire encyclopddique de tMorie et de sociologie du droit (~d. Arnaud), Paris: Story-Scientia, pp. 199- 201.
 
Yoshino 92
Yohino, H. and Kakuta, T. "The Knowledge Representationof Legal Expert System LES-3.3 with Legal Meta-inference', Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium "Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning Systems", 1992; Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1-9.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniel Poulin: colleagues
Paul Bratley: colleagues
Jacques Frémont: colleagues
Ejan Mackaay: colleagues