ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Brief announcement: exactly electing a unique leader is not harder than computing symmetric functions on anonymous quantum networks
Full text PdfPdf (283 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing archive
Proceedings of the 28th ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing table of contents
Calgary, AB, Canada
SESSION: B3-2 table of contents
Pages 334-335  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-396-9
Authors
Hirotada Kobayashi  National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
Keiji Matsumoto  National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
Seiichiro Tani  NTT Corporation, Atsugi, Japan
Sponsors
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1582716.1582796
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper proves that, if quantum communication and computation are available and the number of parties is given, the leader election problem can exactly (i.e., without error in bounded time) be solved with at most the same complexity up to a constant factor as that of computing certain symmetric functions on an anonymous network of any unknown topology. Together with a novel quantum algorithm that computes a certain symmetric function, this characterization yields a quantum leader election algorithm that is more efficient than existing algorithms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
 
4
G. Brassard, P. Høyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp. Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. In Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: A Millennium Volume, AMS Contemporary Mathematics Series vol. 305, pages 53--74. 2002.
 
5
6
 
7
E. D'Hondt and P. Panangaden. The computational power of the W and GHZ states. Quantum Inf. Comput., 6(2):173---183, 2006.
 
8
C. Gavoille, A. Kosowski, and M. Markiewicz. What can be observed locally? Round-based models for quantum distributed computing. arXiv:0903.1133, 2009.
 
9
 
10
 
11
E. Kranakis and D. Krizanc. Distributed computing on cayley networks (extended abstract). In Proc. 4th IEEE SPDP, pages 222--229, 1992.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
S. P. Pal, S. K. Singh, and S. Kumar. Multi-partite quantum entanglement versus randomization: Fair and unbiased leader election in networks. arXiv:quant-ph/0306195, 2003.
 
16
S. Tani, H. Kobayashi, and K. Matsumoto. Exact quantum algorithms for the leader election problem. In Proc. 22nd STACS, LNCS vol. 3404, pages 581--592,2005. (Full version in arXiv:0712.4213).
 
17
 
18

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hirotada Kobayashi: colleagues
Keiji Matsumoto: colleagues
Seiichiro Tani: colleagues