ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bounding the locality of distributed routing algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (483 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing archive
Proceedings of the 28th ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing table of contents
Calgary, AB, Canada
SESSION: R7 table of contents
Pages 250-259  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-396-9
Authors
Prosenjit Bose  Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Paz Carmi  Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Stephane Durocher  University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MAN, Canada
Sponsors
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1582716.1582756
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We examine bounds on the locality of routing. A local routing algorithm makes a sequence of distributed forwarding decisions, each of which is made using only local information. Specifically, in addition to knowing the node for which a message is destined, an intermediate node might also know a) the subgraph corresponding to all network nodes within k hops of itself, for some value of k, b) the node from which the message originated, and c) which of its neighbours last forwarded the message. Our objective is to determine which of these parameters are necessary and/or sufficient to permit local routing as k varies on a network modelled by a connected undirected graph. In particular, we establish tight bounds on k for the feasibility of deterministic k-local routing for various combinations of these parameters, as well as corresponding bounds on dilation (the worst-case ratio of actual route length to shortest path length).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Bose, A. Brodnik, S. Carlsson, E. D. Demaine, R. Fleischer, A. López-Ortiz, P. Morin, and I. Munro. Online routing in convex subdivisions. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, 12(4):283--295, 2002.
 
2
P. Bose and P. Morin. Online routing in triangulations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 33(4):937--951, 2004.
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
S. Durocher, D. Kirkpatrick, and L. Narayanan. On routing with guaranteed delivery in three-dimensional ad hoc wireless networks. Wireless Networks, 2008. To appear.
 
7
G. G. Finn. Routing and addressing problems in large metropolitan-scale internetworks. Technical Report ISI/RR-87-180, Information Sciences Institute, 1987.
 
8
R. Flury and R. Wattenhofer. Randomized 3D geographic routing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 834--842, 2008.
 
9
M. Fraser. Local routing on tori. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ad-Hoc, Mobile, and Wireless Networks, volume 4686 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1--14. Springer, 2007.
 
10
M. Fraser, E. Kranakis, and J. Urrutia. Memory requirements for local geometric routing and traversal in digraphs. In Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG), volume 20, 2008.
 
11
E. Kranakis, H. Singh, and J. Urrutia. Compass routing on geometric networks. In Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG), volume 11, pages 51--54, 1999.
12
 
13
I. Stojmenović. Position based routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(7):128-134, 2002.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Prosenjit Bose: colleagues
Paz Carmi: colleagues
Stephane Durocher: colleagues