ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Correctness of gossip-based membership under message loss
Full text PdfPdf (656 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing archive
Proceedings of the 28th ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing table of contents
Calgary, AB, Canada
SESSION: R4 table of contents
Pages 151-160  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-396-9
Authors
Maxim Gurevich  Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
Idit Keidar  Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
Sponsors
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1582716.1582743
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Due to their simplicity and effectiveness, gossip-based membership protocols have become the method of choice for maintaining partial membership in large P2P systems. A variety of gossip-based membership protocols were proposed. Some were shown to be effective empirically, lacking analytic understanding of their properties. Others were analyzed under simplifying assumptions, such as lossless and delay-less network. It is not clear whether the analysis results hold in dynamic networks where both nodes and network links can fail.

In this paper we try to bridge this gap. We first enumerate the desirable properties of a gossip-based membership protocol, such as view uniformity, independence, and load balance. We then propose a simple Send & Forget protocol, and show that even in the presence of message loss, it achieves the desirable properties.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
4
5
6
 
7
Y. Busnel, M. Bertier, and A.-M. Kermarrec. Bridging the Gap between Population and Gossip-based Protocols. Research Report RR-6720, INRIA, 2008.
8
 
9
T. I. Fenner and A. M. Frieze. On the connectivity of random m-orientable graphs and digraphs. Combinatorica, 2(4):347--359, 1982.
10
 
11
 
12
D. Gavidia, S. Voulgaris, and M. van Steen. Epidemic-style monitoring in large-scale sensor networks. Technical Report IR-CS-012, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands, March 2005.
 
13
C. Gkantsidis, M. Mihail, and A. Saberi. Random walks in peer-to-peer networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.
 
14
 
15
M. Gurevich and I. Keidar. Correctness of gossip-based membership under message loss. Technical Report CCIT Report #732, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion, 2009.
16
17
18
19
20
 
21
22
 
23
S. Voulgaris, D. Gavidia, and M. van Steen. CYCLON: Inexpensive Membership Management for Unstructured P2P Overlays. J. of Network and Systems Management, 13(2):197--217, July 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Maxim Gurevich: colleagues
Idit Keidar: colleagues