| Asynchronous distributed PF algorithm for WSN target tracking |
| Full text |
Pdf
(462 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference On Communications And Mobile Computing
archive
Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: Connecting the World Wirelessly
table of contents
Leipzig, Germany
SESSION: Applications and data gathering (Wireless Sensor Networks symp.)
table of contents
Pages 1168-1172
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-569-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Chunhe Song
|
Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
|
|
Hai Zhao
|
Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
|
|
Wei Jing
|
Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 32, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Particle filtering (PF) has been widely used in solving nonlinear/non Gaussian filtering problems. Inferring to the target tracking in a wireless sensor network (WSN), distributed PF (DPF) was used due to the limitation of nodes' computing capacity. In this paper, a novel filtering method -- asynchronous DPF (ADPF) for target tracking in WSN is proposed. There are two keys in the proposed algorithm. Firstly, instead of transferring value and weight of particles, Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is used to approximate the posteriori distribution, and only GMM parameters need to be transferred which can reduce the bandwidth and power consumption. Secondly, in order to use sampling information effectively, when target moving to the next cluster head region, the GMM parameters are transfer to the next cluster head, and combine with the new local GMM parameters to compose the new GMM parameters incrementally. The ADPF can also deal with the situation of different number of nodes in different cluster when using the dynamic cluster structure. The proposed ADPF is compared to some other DPF for WSN target tracking, and the experimental results show that not only the precision is improved, but also the bandwidth and power is reduced.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
D. Guo and X. Wang, Quasi-monte Carlo Filtering in nonlinear dynamic systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. vol 54, no. 6. pp 2087--2098, 2006.
|
| |
2
|
Arulampalam M S, Maskell S, Gordon N, et al. A Tutorial on Particle Filters for Online Nonlinear/Non-Gaussian Bayesian Tracking {J}. IEEE Trans on Signal Processing, 2002, 20(2): 174--188.
|
| |
3
|
Crisan D, Doucet A. A Survey of Convergence Results on Particle Filtering methods for Practitioners {J}. IEEE Trans on Signal Processing, 2002, 50(3): 736--746.
|
| |
4
|
Anderson, B. D. and Moore, J. B. Optimal Filtering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1979.
|
| |
5
|
X. Rong Li, and V. P. Jilkov, "Survey of maneuvering target tarcking part I: Dynamci models", in IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic System, Vol. 39, 2003.
|
| |
6
|
X. Rong Li and Vesselin P. Jilkov, "A Survey of Maneuvering Target Tracking-Part III: Measurement Models", in SPIE Conf. on Signal and Data Processing of Small Target, 2001.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Julier, S. J and Uhlmann, J. K. A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems, Proc. of AeroSense: The 11th International Sysmpsium on Aerospace/Defence Sensing, Simulation and Controls, Orlando, Florida, 1997. Vol. Muti Sensor Fusion, Tracking and Resource Mangement II p. 182--193.
|
| |
9
|
Shi Y, Eberhart R. C. A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1998, 69--73
|
| |
10
|
Riget, J. A Diversity-guided Particle Swarm Optimizer-the ARPSO. EVALife Technical Report 2002--02, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Arhus, 2002
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
|