|
ABSTRACT
As future wireless networks become more diverse, there are important performance limits when network conditions become more extreme. An important performance limit in dense networks is the scalability of routing and of topology updates dissemination in particular. In previous work [16], the expected performance of diverse approaches to topology update schemes using flat flooding, Multi-Point relays (MPRs), and Connected Dominating Sets (CDSs), has been modeled and analyzed. Analysis showed that one representative of the analyzed CDS models, the CDS-based Hexagon one, offered order of magnitude less overhead in dense networks with a small increase in routing stretch. To our knowledge, other existing distributed CDS heuristics cannot match the performance of this model. In this work, we are advancing the CDS-HEX topology dissemination approach from the limited-scope centralized scenarios with strict symmetrical relays placement to any general dynamic scenario with totally random placement of nodes. We propose novel heuristics to approximate the theoretically optimal CDS-HEX for dynamic environments. We are showing that: a) although the distributed scheme operates sub-optimally compared to its centralized ancestor, it is still superior to the MPR scheme in key metrics, b) the set-up overhead of the more sophisticated distributed CDS-HEX is not significantly higher than this of MPRs, while the steady state overhead of CDS-HEX turns to be lower, and c) simulations verify all the closed analytical formulae and asymptotic results of previous analysis and provide additional insight on metrics that cannot be analytically measured.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
S. Bohacek, "A Component-Based Performance Model of a Generalized OLSR," ARL-CTA TR, Sept.'07.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
A. Laouiti, A. Qayyum, L. Viennot, "Multipoint relaying: an efficient technique for flooding in mobile wireless networks," In 35th HICSS'01, IEEE Computer Society, '01.
|
| |
4
|
C. Adjih, P. Jacquet, LViennot, "Computing connected dominated sets with multipoint relays", http://www.inria.fr/rrrt/rr-4597.html, 2002.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, P. Jacquet, "The Optimized Link State Routing protocol version2," draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-04.txt, July' 07.
|
| |
7
|
T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, J. Dean, C. Adjih, "Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format, "draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-09.txt, Sep. '07.
|
| |
8
|
T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, "Representing multi-value time in MANETs", draft-ietf-manet-timetlv-01.txt, June '07.
|
| |
9
|
T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, B. Adamson, "Jitter considerations in MANET," work in progress draft-ietf-manet-jitter-01.txt, June'07
|
| |
10
|
J. Moy, "OSPF Version 2," RFC 2328, April 1998.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
M. Chandra, A. Roy, "Extensions to OSPF to support mobile ad hoc networking," draft-chandra-ospf-manet-ext-05, Aug. '07.
|
| |
13
|
R. Ogier, P. Spagnolo, "MANET Extension of OSPF using CDS Flooding," draft-ogier-manet-ospf-extension-09.txt, March 2007.
|
| |
14
|
M. Striki, A. McAuley, R. Morera, "Topology Dissemination and Representation for Link State Routing Protocol: Alternatives to OLSR and OSPF", ARL-CTA 1 TR, Sept.'07.
|
| |
15
|
M. Striki, "Using Novel Distributed Heuristics on Hexagonal Connected Dominating Sets to model Routing Dissemination," ARL-CTA TR, Dec. '08.
|
| |
16
|
M. Striki, A. McAuley, R. Morera, "Modeling Topology Dissemination for Routing in Future Force Networks", MILCOM'08, San Diego, California, 19--24 Nov. 2008.
|
| |
17
|
Philippe Jacquet , Anis Laouiti , Pascale Minet , Laurent Viennot, Performance of Multipoint Relaying in Ad Hoc Mobile Routing Protocols, Proceedings of the Second International IFIP-TC6 Networking Conference on Networking Technologies, Services, and Protocols; Performance of Computer and Communication Networks; and Mobile and Wireless Communications, p.387-398, May 19-24, 2002
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
C.
Computer Systems Organization
C.2
COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
C.2.1
Network Architecture and Design
Subjects:
Distributed networks
Additional Classification:
C.
Computer Systems Organization
C.2
COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
C.2.1
Network Architecture and Design
Subjects:
Network topology
C.2.2
Network Protocols
Subjects:
Routing protocols
C.4
PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEMS
General Terms:
Algorithms,
Design,
Documentation,
Experimentation,
Measurement,
Performance,
Reliability,
Theory,
Verification
Keywords:
analysis,
connected dominating sets,
distributed routing,
hexagons,
routing dissemination,
routing overhead,
simulations,
stretch
|