ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Visual intelligence density: definition, measurement, and implementation
Full text PdfPdf (1.66 MB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference NZ Chapter of the ACM's Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction table of contents
Auckland, New Zealand
Pages 93-100  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-574-1
Authors
Xiaoyan Bai  University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
David White  University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
David Sundaram  University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Sponsors
: The University of Auckland
: New Zealand Chapter of ACM SIGCHI
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1577782.1577799
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Advanced visualization systems have been widely adopted by decision makers for dealing with problems involving spatial, temporal and multi-dimensional features. While these systems tend to provide reasonable support for particular paradigms, domains, and data types, they are very weak when it comes to supporting multi-paradigm, multi-domain problems that deal with complex spatio-temporal multi-dimensional data. This has led to visualizations that are context insensitive, data dense, and sparse in intelligence. There is a crucial need for visualizations that capture the essence of the relevant information in limited visual spaces allowing decision makers to take better decisions with less effort and time. To address these problems and issues, we propose a visual decision making process that increases the intelligence density of information provided by visualizations. To support this we propose a mechanism by which one could judge the intelligence density of visualizations. Furthermore, we propose and implement a framework and architecture to support the above process in a manner that is independent of data, domain, and paradigm. The system allows decision makers to create, manipulate, layer and view visualizations flexibly enabling the increase in the density of intelligence that they provide.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Santos, S. D. and Brodlie, K. 2004. Gaining Understanding of Multivariate and Multidimensional Data through Visualization. Computers and Graphics. 28, 3, 311--325
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Konstantinides, K. and Rasure, J. R. 1994. The Khoros Software Development Environment for Image and Signal Processing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 3, 3, 243--252.
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
He, G. G., Kovalerchuk, B., and Mroz, T. 2004. Multilevel Analytical and Visual Decision Framework for Imagery Conflation and Registration. In Visual and Spatial Analysis: Advances in Data Mining Reasoning, and Problem Solving, Kovalerchuk, B. and Schwing, Eds. Springer, 435--472.
 
19
 
20
Chermack, T. J. 2005. Studying Scenario Planning: Theory, Research Suggestions and Hypotheses. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 72, 1, 59--73.
 
21
Keough, S. M. and Shanahan, K. J. 2008. Scenario Planning: Toward a More Complete Model for Practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 10, 2, 166--178.
 
22
Schoemaker, P. 1991. When and How to Use Scenario Planning: a Heuristic Approach with Illustration. Journal of Forecasting. 10, 6, 549--564.
 
23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xiaoyan Bai: colleagues
David White: colleagues
David Sundaram: colleagues