| Behaviour characteristics: low and high literacy users information seeking on social service websites |
| Full text |
Pdf
(479 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
archive
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference NZ Chapter of the ACM's Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction
table of contents
Auckland, New Zealand
Pages 13-16
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-574-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20, Downloads (12 Months): 45, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the behaviour characteristics of low and high literacy users, information seeking of an on-line social service system. The finding of this paper is based on the qualitative study which involves ten volunteers participated in this study. To classify these participants within the literacy scale, National Skills for Life Survey is used. According to this survey, five volunteers are classified as high literate; and the remaining were as low literate. All participants were asked to think-aloud whilst carrying out the information search using the "Adviceguide" website. The four information search tasks were of varying difficulty; easy, medium and difficult. Observations, video recording and a semi-structured interview technique that use cognitive probes were used. The qualitative data were transcribed and analysed using Grounded Theory and Emergent Themes Analysis approach. The eight characteristics of what identified; Verification, Reading, Recovery, Trajectories, Focus, Satisfied, Representation and Abandon. Results showed that low and high literacy users demonstrated critically different behaviour characteristics.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Kodagoda, N., Wong, B. L. W. and Khan, N. 2009. Identifying Information Seeking Behaviours of Low and High Literacy Users: Combined Cognitive Task Analysis. NDM9.
|
| |
3
|
Shalla, V. and Schellenberg, G. 1998. The Value of Words: Literacy and Economic Security in Canada. Catalogue No. 89-552-MPE., Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
|
| |
4
|
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
|
| |
5
|
Summers, K. and Summers, M. 2005. Reading and Navigational Strategies Of Web Users With Lower Literacy Skills. In 68th Annual Meeting Of The American Society For Information Science and Technology (ASIST).
|
| |
6
|
Williams, J., Clemens, S., Oleinikova, K. and Tarvin, K. 2003. The Skills for Life survey: A national needs and impact survey of literacy, numeracy and ICT skills. London: BMRB Social Research for the Department for education and Skills.
|
| |
7
|
Wong, B. L. W. 2006. The Critical Decision Method. International Encyclopaedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics. CRC Press: 2006. pp. 3067--3073.
|
| |
8
|
Wong, B. L. W. and Blandford, A. 2002. Analysing Ambulance Dispatcher Decision Making: Trialing Emergent Themes Analysis. in HF2002, "Design for the whole person - integrating physical, cognitive and social as-pects". ESA & CHISIG.
|
|