| Impact of classroom design on interactive whiteboard use in a special needs classroom |
| Full text |
Pdf
(862 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
archive
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference NZ Chapter of the ACM's Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction
table of contents
Auckland, New Zealand
Pages 1-4
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-574-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 38, Downloads (12 Months): 83, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The physical environment of a classroom---how space is organized and controlled---impacts the use of technology within that setting. This paper presents the initial rationale for choosing an interactive whiteboard (IWB) as the platform for software designed to encourage play in primary students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. An observational study of normal classroom practice and of an installed version of the software uncovered factors in the physical installation of the IWB and its pedagogical use that negatively affect its potential use.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Beeland, W. D. 2002. Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help? Action Research Exchange, 1, 1 (Summer 2002). DOI=http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/volno1/belland_am.pdf
|
| |
2
|
Billingsley, J., Browning, B., and Wilting, K. 2006. Exploratory Play/Time: An investigation within three elementary classrooms Educational Insights, 10, 1, (2006). DOI=http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insights/v10n0 1/articles/browningetal.html
|
| |
3
|
Dautenhahn, K. 2000. Design issues on interactive environments for children with autism. Proceedings International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies (ICDVRAT), 153--161.
|
| |
4
|
Furneaux, B. 1984. Keeping the balance right. Special Education: Forward Trends, 11(2) (June 1984), 15--16.
|
| |
5
|
Hall, I., and S. Higgins. 2005. Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 102--117.
|
| |
6
|
Keay-Bright, W. 2007. The Reactive Colours Project: Demonstrating Participatory and Collaborative Design Methods for the Creation of Software for Autistic Children, Design Principles & Practices: An International Journal, 1(2), 133--151.
|
| |
7
|
Keay-Bright, W. 2007. Can computers create relaxation? Designing ReacTickles© software with children on the autistic spectrum. NCDN, 3(2), 97--110.
|
| |
8
|
Piaget, J. 1962. Play, dreams and imitation. W. W. Norton and Company, Ltd.
|
| |
9
|
Preissler, M. A. (2006). Play and Autism: Facilitating Symbolic Understanding, 231--250. In Play = Learning. Oxford University Press.
|
| |
10
|
Proshansky, E., and Wolfe, M. 1974. The physical setting and open education. School Review, 82, 557--574.
|
| |
11
|
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
| |
12
|
Weinstein, C. S. 1981. Classroom design as an external condition for learning. Educational Technology (Aug 1981), 12--19.
|
|