ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Summary of the Dagstuhl workshop on future directions in software engineering: February 17–21, 1992, Schloß Dagstuhl
Full text PdfPdf (1.62 MB)
Source ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 18 ,  Issue 1  (January 1993) table of contents
Pages: 35 - 48  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISSN:0163-5948
Authors
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/157397.157399
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The intent of the workshop was to bring together leading scientists for identifying promising directions for future research in Software Engineering. The motivation for the workshop was the realization that Software Engineering research was not in good shape, with the present emphasis on management and risk control diverting attention from hard, technical subjects.After week-long, intensive discussions of a great number of issues, the following topics were seen as most crucial for progress:1. Developing the area of software architecture as a foundation of Software Engineering;2. Learning to master evolving systems;3. Building a scientific basis for Software Engineering;4. Emphasizing science and engineering know-how when educating practitioners.Formal methods, domain specific knowledge, special purpose languages, and reuse were seen as important approaches, but not as solutions or ends in themselves. There was also a fair amount of introspection on proper method, evaluation, and experimentation in Software Engineering research.This report contains participants' position statements and a record of the discussions. The editors hope that it may help make research in Software Engineering an exciting and thriving endeavor once again.



Collaborative Colleagues:
Walter F. Tichy: colleagues
Nico Habermann: colleagues
Lutz Prechelt: colleagues