|
ABSTRACT
Abstraction in imagery results from the strategic simplification and elimination of detail to clarify the visual structure of the depicted shape. It is a mainstay of artistic practice and an important ingredient of effective visual communication. We develop a computational method for the abstract depiction of 2D shapes. Our approach works by organizing the shape into parts using a new synthesis of holistic features of the part shape, local features of the shape boundary, and global aspects of shape organization. Our abstractions are new shapes with fewer and clearer parts.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Blum, H., and Nagel, R. 1978. Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features. Pattern Recog. 10, 167--180.
|
| |
3
|
Brady, M., and Asada, H. 1984. Smoothed local symetries and their implementation. Int. J. of Robotics Research 3, 3, 36--61.
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Douglas, D., and Peucker, T. 1973. Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. The Canadian Cartographer 10, 2, 112--122.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Giblin, P., and Brassett, S. 1985. Local symmetry of plane curves. The American Mathematical Monthly 92, 10, 689--707.
|
| |
13
|
Gold, C., and Thibault, D. 2001. Map generalization by skeleton retraction. In Proceedings of the International Cartographic Association, 2072--2081.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Hoffman, D. D., and Singh, M. 1997. Salience of visual parts. Cognition 63, 29--78.
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
Jeong, K., Ni, A., Lee, S., and Markosian, L. 2005. Detail control in line drawings of 3D meshes. The Visual Computer 21, 8--10 (September), 698--706. Pacific Graphics 2005.
|
| |
18
|
Kang, H., and Lee, S. 2008. Shape-simplifying image abstraction. Computer Graphics Forum (Pacific Graphics 2008 Conference Proceedings) 27, 7, 1773--1780.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
Kolliopoulos, A., Wang, J. M., and Hertzmann, A. 2006. Segmentation-based 3D artistic rendering. In Rendering Techniques 2006: 17th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 361--370.
|
 |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
Leyton, M. 1992. Symmetry, Causality, Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
|
| |
24
|
McCloud, S. 1993. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Harper Perennial.
|
| |
25
|
Mi, X., and DeCarlo, D. 2007. Separating parts from 2D shapes using relatability. In ICCV 2007.
|
 |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
Prasad, L. 1997. Morphological analysis of shapes. Tech. Rep. CNLS Newsletter, No. 139, LALP-97-010-139, Center for Nonlinear Studies, T-DOT, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, July.
|
| |
30
|
Robinson, A. H., Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C., Kimerling, A. J., and Guptill, S. C. 1995. Elements of Cartography, 6th edition. Wiley.
|
| |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
|
 |
33
|
|
 |
34
|
|
 |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
Singh, M., and Fulvio, J. M. 2005. Visual extrapolation of contour geometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 3, 939--944.
|
| |
38
|
Singh, M., and Hoffman, D. D. 2001. Part-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. In From Fragments to Objects: Grouping and Segmentation in Vision, T. F. Shipley and P. J. Kellman, Eds. Elsevier Science Ltd., 401--459.
|
| |
39
|
Singh, M., Seyraninan, G., and Hoffman, D. 1999. Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 636--660.
|
| |
40
|
Van Der Poorten, P., and Jones, C. B. 2002. Characterisation and generalisation of cartographic lines using Delaunay triangulation. International Journal of Geographical Information science, 8, 773--794.
|
 |
41
|
|
 |
42
|
|
|