ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How users use access control
Full text PdfPdf (364 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security table of contents
Mountain View, California
SESSION: Tools table of contents
Article No. 15  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-736-3
Authors
D. K. Smetters  PARC, Palo Alto, CA
Nathan Good  PARC, Palo Alto, CA
Sponsors
: Carnegie Mellon CyLab
: Google
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 91,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1572532.1572552
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Existing technologies for file sharing differ widely in the granularity of control they give users over who can access their data; achieving finer-grained control generally requires more user effort. We want to understand what level of control users need over their data, by examining what sorts of access policies users actually create in practice.

We used automated data mining techniques to examine the real-world use of access control features present in standard document sharing systems in a corporate environment as used over a long (> 10 year) time span. We find that while users rarely need to change access policies, the policies they do express are actually quite complex. We also find that users participate in larger numbers of access control and email sharing groups than measured by self-report in previous studies. We hypothesize that much of this complexity might be reduced by considering these policies as examples of simpler access control patterns. From our analysis of what access control features are used and where errors are made, we propose a set of design guidelines for access control systems themselves and the tools used to manage them, intended to increase usability and decrease error.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
M. Corporation. Best practices for permissions and user rights, January 2005. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779601.aspx.
 
4
D. Ferraiolo and R. Kuhn. Role-based access controls. In 15th NIST-NCSC National Computer Security Conference, pages 554--563, 1992.
 
5
Flickr. http://www.flickr.com.
6
 
7
8
9
 
10
11
12
13
14
 
15
16
17
 
18
M. E. Zurko, R. Simon, and T. Sanfilippo. A user-centered, modular authorization service built on an RBAC foundation. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 57--71, 1999.
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
D. K. Smetters: colleagues
Nathan Good: colleagues