| How users use access control |
| Full text |
Pdf
(364 KB)
|
Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
archive
Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
table of contents
Mountain View, California
Article No. 15
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-736-3
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27, Downloads (12 Months): 91, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Existing technologies for file sharing differ widely in the granularity of control they give users over who can access their data; achieving finer-grained control generally requires more user effort. We want to understand what level of control users need over their data, by examining what sorts of access policies users actually create in practice. We used automated data mining techniques to examine the real-world use of access control features present in standard document sharing systems in a corporate environment as used over a long (> 10 year) time span. We find that while users rarely need to change access policies, the policies they do express are actually quite complex. We also find that users participate in larger numbers of access control and email sharing groups than measured by self-report in previous studies. We hypothesize that much of this complexity might be reduced by considering these policies as examples of simpler access control patterns. From our analysis of what access control features are used and where errors are made, we propose a set of design guidelines for access control systems themselves and the tools used to manage them, intended to increase usability and decrease error.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Shane Ahern , Dean Eckles , Nathaniel S. Good , Simon King , Mor Naaman , Rahul Nair, Over-exposed?: privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1240624.1240683]
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
M. Corporation. Best practices for permissions and user rights, January 2005. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779601.aspx.
|
| |
4
|
D. Ferraiolo and R. Kuhn. Role-based access controls. In 15th NIST-NCSC National Computer Security Conference, pages 554--563, 1992.
|
| |
5
|
Flickr. http://www.flickr.com.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
Robert W. Reeder , Lujo Bauer , Lorrie Faith Cranor , Michael K. Reiter , Kelli Bacon , Keisha How , Heather Strong, Expandable grids for visualizing and authoring computer security policies, Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2008, Florence, Italy
[doi> 10.1145/1357054.1357285]
|
 |
14
|
Jennifer Rode , Carolina Johansson , Paul DiGioia , Roberto Silva Filho , Kari Nies , David H. Nguyen , Jie Ren , Paul Dourish , David Redmiles, Seeing further: extending visualization as a basis for usable security, Proceedings of the second symposium on Usable privacy and security, July 12-14, 2006, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
[doi> 10.1145/1143120.1143138]
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
Stephen Voida , W. Keith Edwards , Mark W. Newman , Rebecca E. Grinter , Nicolas Ducheneaut, Share and share alike: exploring the user interface affordances of file sharing, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/1124772.1124806]
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
M. E. Zurko, R. Simon, and T. Sanfilippo. A user-centered, modular authorization service built on an RBAC foundation. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 57--71, 1999.
|
 |
19
|
|
|