ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Balancing usability and security in a video CAPTCHA
Full text PdfPdf (714 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security table of contents
Mountain View, California
SESSION: Tools table of contents
Article No. 14  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-736-3
Authors
Kurt Alfred Kluever  Google, Inc., New York, NY
Richard Zanibbi  Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Sponsors
: Carnegie Mellon CyLab
: Google
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1572532.1572551
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a technique for using content-based video labeling as a CAPTCHA task. Our CAPTCHAs are generated from YouTube videos, which contain labels (tags) supplied by the person that uploaded the video. They are graded using a video's tags, as well as tags from related videos. In a user study involving 184 participants, we were able to increase the human success rate on our video CAPTCHA from roughly 70% to 90%, while keeping the success rate of a tag frequency-based attack fixed at around 13%. Through a different parameterization of the challenge generation and grading algorithms, we were able to reduce the success rate of the same attack to 2%, while still increasing the human success rate from 70% to 75%. The usability and security of our video CAPTCHA appears to be comparable to existing CAPTCHAs, and a majority of participants (60%) indicated that they found the video CAPTCHAs more enjoyable than traditional CAPTCHAs in which distorted text must be transcribed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
K. Chellapilla, K. Larson, P. Y. Simard, and M. Czerwinski. Building Segmentation Based Human-friendly Human Interaction Proofs (HIPs). In Proc. HIP 2005, LNCS (2005), 1--26.
 
4
M. Chew and H. S. Baird. Baffletext: A Human Interactive Proof. In Proc. DRR 2003, IST/SPIE (2003), 305--316.
 
5
M. Chew and J. D. Tygar. Image Recognition CAPTCHAs. In Proc. ISC 2004, LNCS (2004), 268--279.
6
7
 
8
P. B. Godfrey Text-based CAPTCHA algorithms. In Proc. HIP 2002.
9
 
10
L. A. Goodman. Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32, 1 (1961), 148--170.
11
12
13
 
14
A. Kerckhoffs. La Cryptographie Militaire. Journal des Sciences Militaires 9, (1883), 161--191.
 
15
K. A. Kluever. Evaluating the Usability and Security of a Video CAPTCHA. Master's thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology, 2008.
 
16
 
17
V. I. Levenshtein. Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10, (1966), 707--710.
 
18
J. B. Lovins. Development of a Stemming Algorithm. Mechanical Translation and Computational Linguistics 11, (1968), 22--31.
 
19
M. Naor. Verification of a human in the loop or Identification via the Turing Test. Unpublished manuscript, (1996).
 
20
 
21
M. F. Porter. An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Program 14, 3 (1980), 130--137.
 
22
Y. Rui and Z. Liu. ARTiFACIAL: Automated Reverse Turing test using FACIAL features. Multimedia Systems Journal 9, 6 (2004), 493--502.
 
23
 
24
A. M. Turing. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59, 236 (1950), 433--460.
 
25
26
27
28
29

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kurt Alfred Kluever: colleagues
Richard Zanibbi: colleagues