ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Social applications: exploring a more secure framework
Full text PdfPdf (170 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security table of contents
Mountain View, California
SESSION: Mental models table of contents
Article No. 2  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-736-3
Authors
Andrew Besmer  University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
Heather Richter Lipford  University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
Mohamed Shehab  University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
Gorrell Cheek  University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
Sponsors
: Carnegie Mellon CyLab
: Google
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 85,   Downloads (12 Months): 150,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1572532.1572535
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Online social network sites, such as MySpace, Facebook and others have grown rapidly, with hundreds of millions of active users. A new feature on many sites is social applications -- applications and services written by third party developers that provide additional functionality linked to a user's profile. However, current application platforms put users at risk by permitting the disclosure of large amounts of personal information to these applications and their developers. This paper formally abstracts and defines the current access control model applied to these applications, and builds on it to create a more secure framework. We do so in the interest of preserving as much of the current architecture as possible, while seeking to provide a practical balance between security and privacy needs of the users, and the needs of the applications to access users' information. We present a user study of our interface design for setting a user-to-application policy. Our results indicate that the model and interface work for users who are more concerned with their privacy, but we still need to explore alternate means of creating policies for those who are less concerned.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/7375772.stm, accessed September 29, 2008.
2
 
3
CNet News, http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9977762-7.html, Accessed September 29, 2008.
4
 
5
 
6
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics, accessed September 29, 2008.
 
7
Felt A. and Evans D., Privacy Protection for Social Networking Platforms. In Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2008, May 2008.
8
 
9
Jones H., Soltren J., Facebook: Threats to Privacy. MIT, December 14, 2005. Retrieved from http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/6805/student-papers/fall05-papers/facebook.pdf.
 
10
Kumaraguru P. and Cranor L. 2005, Privacy Indexes: A Survey of Westin's Studies, ISRI Technical Report, CMU-ISRI-05-138, 2005.
 
11
 
12
OpenSocial http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial/, accessed September 29, 2008.
13
 
14
Saltzer J., Schroeder M., The Protection of Information in Computer Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 63(9), 1278--1308 1975.
 
15
 
16
Sophos.com (2007). Facebook ID probe shows 41% of users happy to reveal all to potential identity thieves. Accessed August 8, 2007.
 
17
Stutzman F., An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. In the Proceedings of iDMAa and IMS Code Conference, 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew Besmer: colleagues
Heather Richter Lipford: colleagues
Mohamed Shehab: colleagues
Gorrell Cheek: colleagues