ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Visualizing the problems with the INEX topics
Full text PdfPdf (714 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages 826-826  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-483-6
Authors
Andrew Trotman  University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Maria del Rocio Gomez Crisostomo  Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz,, Spain
Mounia Lalmas  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland Uk
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 51,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1572148
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Topics form a crucial component of a test collection. We show, through visualization, that the INEX 2008 topics have shortcomings, which questions their validity for evaluating XML retrieval effectiveness.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
Lehtonen, M. Designing User Studies for XML Retrieval. SIGIR 2006 Workshop on XML Element Retrieval Methodology, pp28--34.
5
6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew Trotman: colleagues
Maria del Rocio Gomez Crisostomo: colleagues
Mounia Lalmas: colleagues