ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Topic (query) selection for IR evaluation
Full text PdfPdf (363 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages 802-803  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-483-6
Authors
Jianhan Zhu  University College London, London, United Kingdom
Jun Wang  University College London, London, United Kingdom
Vishwa Vinay  Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Ingemar J. Cox  University College London, London, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 74,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1572136
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The need for evaluating large amounts of topics (queries) makes IR evaluation an uneasy task. In this paper, we study a topic selection problem for IR evaluation. The selection criterion is based on the overall difficulty of the chosen set, as well as the uncertainty of the final IR metric applied to the systems. Our preliminary experiments demonstrate that our approach helps to identify a set of topics that provides confident estimates of systems' performance while keeping the requirement of the query difficulty.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
H. M. Markowitz. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, and Chapman&Hall, Limited, London, 1959.
3
 
4
J. L. Rodgers and W. A. Nicewander. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42:59--66, 1988.
5
6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jianhan Zhu: colleagues
Jun Wang: colleagues
Vishwa Vinay: colleagues
Ingemar J. Cox: colleagues