ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Revisiting logical imaging for information retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (313 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages 766-767  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-483-6
Authors
Guido Zuccon  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Leif Azzopardi  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Cornelis J. van Rijsbergen  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1572118
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Retrieval with Logical Imaging is derived from belief revision and provides a novel mechanism for estimating the relevance of a document through logical implication (i.e. P(q->d). In this poster, we perform the first comprehensive evaluation of Logical Imaging (LI) in Information Retrieval (IR) across several TREC test Collections. When compared against standard baseline models, we show that LI fails to improve performance. This failure can be attributed to a nuance within the model that means non-relevant documents are promoted in the ranking, while relevant documents are demoted. This is an important contribution because it not only contextualizes the effectiveness of LI, but crucially explains why it fails. By addressing this nuance, future LI models could be significantly improved.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. Amati and S. Kerpedjiev. An Information Retrieval Logic Model: Implementation and Experiments. Technical Report Rel5B04892, FUB, Italy, 1992.
 
2
F. Crestani, I. Ruthven, M. Sanderson, and C.J. van Rijsbergen. The Troubles with Using a Logical Model of IR on a Large Collection of Documents. In Proc. TREC4, pages 509--526, 1995.
3
4

Collaborative Colleagues:
Guido Zuccon: colleagues
Leif Azzopardi: colleagues
Cornelis J. van Rijsbergen: colleagues