ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Feature selection for automatic taxonomy induction
Full text PdfPdf (291 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages 684-685  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-483-6
Authors
Hui Yang  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Jamie Callan  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 83,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1572077
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Most existing automatic taxonomy induction systems exploit one or more features to induce a taxonomy; nevertheless there is no systematic study examining which are the best features for the task under various conditions. This paper studies the impact of using different features on taxonomy induction for different types of relations and for terms at different abstraction levels. The evaluation shows that different conditions need different technologies or different combination of the technologies. In particular, co-occurrence and lexico-syntactic patterns are good features for is-a, sibling and part-of relations; contextual, co-occurrence, patterns, and syntactic features work well for concrete terms; co-occurrence works well for abstract terms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Cimiano and J. Wenderoth. 2007. Automatic Acquisition of Ranked Qualia Structures from the Web. ACL'07.
 
2
C. Fellbuam. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press.1998.
 
3
 
4
Z. Harris. 1985. Distributional Structure. In: J. J. Katz (ed.), The Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
 
5
6
 
7
H. Yang and J. Callan. 2009. A Metric-based Framework for Automatic Taxonomy Induction. ACL'09.