ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Predicting user interests from contextual information
Full text PdfPdf (817 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Interactive search table of contents
Pages 363-370  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-483-6
Authors
Ryen W. White  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Peter Bailey  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Liwei Chen  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 103,   Downloads (12 Months): 411,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1572005
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Search and recommendation systems must include contextual information to effectively model users' interests. In this paper, we present a systematic study of the effectiveness of five variant sources of contextual information for user interest modeling. Post-query navigation and general browsing behaviors far outweigh direct search engine interaction as an information-gathering activity. Therefore we conducted this study with a focus on Website recommendations rather than search results. The five contextual information sources used are: social, historic, task, collection, and user interaction. We evaluate the utility of these sources, and overlaps between them, based on how effectively they predict users' future interests. Our findings demonstrate that the sources perform differently depending on the duration of the time window used for future prediction, and that context overlap outperforms any isolated source. Designers of Website suggestion systems can use our findings to provide improved support for post-query navigation and general browsing behaviors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Budzik, J.&Hammond, K. (1999). Watson: anticipating and contextualizing information needs. Proc. ASIS, 727--740.
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
Dupret, G., Murdock, V.&Piwowarski, B. (2007). Web search evaluation using clickthrough data and a user model. Proc. WWW Workshop on Query Log Analysis.
9
 
10
Gunduz, S.U.&ÖÖzsu, M.T., (2003). Recommendation models for user accesses to web pages. Proc. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks, 1003--1010.
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
 
18
19
20
 
21
Lieberman, H. (1995). Letizia: an agent that assists web browsing. Proc. IJCAI, 924--929.
 
22
Oard, D.&Kim, J. (1998). Implicit feedback for recommender systems. Proc. AAAI Wkp. on Rec. Sys., 81--83.
23
24
25
26
27
 
28
Singhal, A. (2001). Modern information retrieval: A brief overview. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 24(4), 35--43.
29
30
31
32
 
33
34
35
36
37

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ryen W. White: colleagues
Peter Bailey: colleagues
Liwei Chen: colleagues