ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Ranking community answers by modeling question-answer relationships via analogical reasoning
Full text PdfPdf (964 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Question answering table of contents
Pages 179-186  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-483-6
Authors
Xin-Jing Wang  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Xudong Tu  Huazhong Science and Technology University, Wuhan, China
Dan Feng  Huazhong Science and Technology University, Wuhan, China
Lei Zhang  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 58,   Downloads (12 Months): 180,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1571974
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The method of finding high-quality answers has significant impact on user satisfaction in community question answering systems. However, due to the lexical gap between questions and answers as well as spam typically existing in user-generated content, filtering and ranking answers is very challenging. Previous solutions mainly focus on generating redundant features, or finding textual clues using machine learning techniques; none of them ever consider questions and their answers as relational data but instead model them as independent information. Moreover, they only consider the answers of the current question, and ignore any previous knowledge that would be helpful to bridge the lexical and semantic gap. We assume that answers are connected to their questions with various types of latent links, i.e. positive indicating high-quality answers, negative links indicating incorrect answers or user-generated spam, and propose an analogical reasoning-based approach which measures the analogy between the new question-answer linkages and those of relevant knowledge which contains only positive links; the candidate answer which has the most analogous link is assumed to be the best answer. We conducted experiments based on 29.8 million Yahoo!Answer question-answer threads and showed the effectiveness of our approach.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
5
 
6
E. Brill, J. Lin, M. Banko, and etc. Data-intensive question answeringa. In TREC, 2001.
 
7
8
 
9
R. French. The computational modeling of analogy-marking. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 6, 2002.
 
10
 
11
L. Getoor, N. Friedman, and etc. Probabilistic relational models. Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning, 2007.
 
12
Z. Ghahramani and K. Heller. Bayesian sets. In Proc. of NIPS, 2005.
 
13
14
15
16
17
18
 
19
J. Ko, L. Si, and E. Nyberg. A probabilistic framework for answer selection in question answering. In Proc. of NAACL/HLT, 2007.
20
 
21
J. Leibenluft. Librarianąŕs worst nightmare: Yahoo!answers, where 120 million users can be wrong. Slate Magazine, 2007.
22
23
 
24
 
25
D. Molla and J. Vicedo. Question answering in restricted domains: An overview. In Proc. of ACL, 2007.
 
26
R. Silva, E. Airoldi, and K. Heller. Small sets of interacting proteins suggest latent linkage mechanisms through analogical reasoning. In Gatsby Technical Report, GCNU TR 2007-001, 2007.
 
27
R. Silva, K. Heller, and Z. Ghahramani. Analogical reasoning with relational bayesian sets. In Proc. of AISTATS, 2007.
28
29
30

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xin-Jing Wang: colleagues
Xudong Tu: colleagues
Dan Feng: colleagues
Lei Zhang: colleagues