ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Simultaneously modeling semantics and structure of threaded discussions: a sparse coding approach and its applications
Full text PdfPdf (780 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Web 2.0 table of contents
Pages 131-138  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-483-6
Authors
Chen Lin  Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Jiang-Ming Yang  Microsoft Research, Asia, Beijing, China
Rui Cai  Microsoft Research, Asia, Beijing, China
Xin-Jing Wang  Microsoft Research, Asia, Beijing, China
Wei Wang  Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 50,   Downloads (12 Months): 176,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1571966
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The huge amount of knowledge in web communities has motivated the research interests in threaded discussions. The dynamic nature of threaded discussions poses lots of challenging problems for computer scientists. Although techniques such as semantic models and structural models have been shown to be useful in a number of areas, they are inefficient in understanding threaded discussions due to three reasons: (I) as most of users read existing messages before posting, posts in a discussion thread are temporally dependent on the previous ones; It causes the semantics and structure to be coupled with each other in threaded discussions; (II) in online discussion threads, there are a lot of junk posts which are useless and may disturb content analysis; and (III) it is very hard to judge the quality of a post. In this paper, we propose a sparse coding-based model named SMSS to Simultaneously Model Semantics and Structure of threaded discussions. The model projects each post into a topic space, and approximates each post by a linear combination of previous posts in the same discussion thread. Meanwhile, the model also imposes two sparse constraints to force a sparse post reconstruction in the topic space and a sparse post approximation from previous posts. The sparse properties effectively take into account the characteristics of threaded discussions. Towards the above three problems, we demonstrate the competency of our model in three applications: reconstructing reply structure of threaded discussions, identifying junk posts, and finding experts in a given board/sub-board in web communities. Experimental results show encouraging performance of the proposed SMSS model in all these applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Balog, L. Azzopardi, and M. de Rijke. A language modeling framework for expert finding. Information Processing and Management, 06(003):1--12, 2008.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
C. Chemudugunta, P. Smyth, and M. Steyvers. Modeling general and specific aspects of documents with a probabilistic topic model. Advances in newral information processing systems, 41(6):391--407, 1990.
6
 
7
S. Ding, G. Cong, C.-Y. Lin, and X. Zhu. Using conditional random Éelds to extract contexts and answers of questions from online forums. In Proc. 11th ACL, pages 710--718, 2008.
8
9
 
10
J. Huang, M. Zhou, and D. Yang. Extracting chatbot knowledge from online discussion forums. In Proc. 11th IJCAI, pages 423--428, 2006.
 
11
J.Scott. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage Publications, London, 2000.
12
13
 
14
A. McCallum, A. Corrada-Emmanuel, and X. Wang. Topic and role discovery in social networks. In Proc. of IJCAI, pages 249--272, 2007.
 
15
G. Mishne, D. Carmel, and R. Lempel. Blocking blog spam with language model disagreement. In Proc. of AIRWeb, 2005.
 
16
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report. Stanford University, 1998.
17
 
18
19
20
 
21
C. Wang, D.M. Blei, and D. Heckerman. Continuous time dynamic topic models. In Proc. of UAI, 2008.
22

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chen Lin: colleagues
Jiang-Ming Yang: colleagues
Rui Cai: colleagues
Xin-Jing Wang: colleagues
Wei Wang: colleagues