ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
On the appropriateness of evolutionary rule learning algorithms for malware detection
Full text PdfPdf (631 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
WORKSHOP SESSION: International workshop on learning classifier systems table of contents
Pages: 2609-2616  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-505-5
Authors
M. Zubair Shafiq  FAST National University of Computer & Emerging Sciences (FAST-NUCES), Islamabad, Pakistan
S. Momina Tabish  FAST National University of Computer & Emerging Sciences (FAST-NUCES), Islamabad, Pakistan
Muddassar Farooq  FAST National University of Computer & Emerging Sciences (FAST-NUCES), Islamabad, Pakistan
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 79,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1570256.1570370
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we evaluate the performance of ten well-known evolutionary and non-evolutionary rule learning algorithms. The comparative study is performed on a real-world classification problem of detecting malicious executables. The executable dataset, used in this study, consists of 189 attributes which are statically extracted from the executables of Microsoft Windows operating system. In our study, we compare the performance of rule learning algorithms with respect to four metrics: (1) classification accuracy, (2) the number of rules in the developed rule set, (3) the comprehensibility of the generated rules, and (4) the processing overhead of the rule learning process. The results of our comparative study suggest that evolutionary rule learning classifiers cannot be deployed in real-world malware detection systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
J. Bacardit, J.M. Garrell, "Evolving Multiple Discretizations with Adaptive Intervals for a Pittsburgh Rule-Based Learning Classifier System", Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), Volume 2724 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1818--1831, Springer, USA, 2003.
 
5
J. Bacardit, J.M. Garrell, "Bloat control and generalization pressure using the minimum description length principle for a Pittsburgh approach Learning Classifier System", International Workshop on Learning Classifier Systems (IWLCS), Volume 4399 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 59--79, Springer, UK, 2007.
 
6
A. Gonzalez, R. Perez, "SLAVE: A genetic learning system based on an iterative approach", IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 7(2), pp. 176--191, 1999.
 
7
W.W. Cohen, "Fast Effective Rule Induction", 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 115--123, Morgan Kaufmann, USA, 1995.
 
8
 
9
 
10
J.R. Quinlan, "MDL and Categorical Theories (Continued)", 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 464--470, Morgan Kaufmann, USA, 1995.
 
11
 
12
A.O. Puig, J. Casillas, E.B. Mansilla, "Genetic-based machine learning systems are competitive for pattern recognition", Evolutioanry Intelligence, 1(3), pp. 209--232, Springer, 2008.
 
13
J. Bacardit, M.V. Butz, "Data Mining in Learning Classifier Systems: Comparing XCS with GAssist", International Workshop on Learning Classifier Systems (IWLCS), Volume 4399 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 282--290, Springer, UK, 2007.
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
K.C. Tan, Q. Yu, C.M. Heng, T.H. Lee, "Evolutionary computing for knowledge discovery in medical diagnosis", Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 27(2), pp. 129--154, Elsevier, 2003.
 
19
Y. Gao, J.Z. Huang, H. Rong, D.Q. Gu, "LCSE: Learning Classifier System Ensemble for Incremental Medical Instances", International Workshop on Learning Classifier Systems (IWLCS), Volume 4399 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 93--103, Springer, UK, 2007.
 
20
 
21
C. Blake, E. Keogh, C. Merz, "UCI repository of machine learning databases", 1998, available at www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html.
 
22
 
23
 
24
P.W. Dixon, D.W. Corne, M.J. Oates, "A ruleset reduction algorithm for the XCSI Learning Classifier System", Volume 2661 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 20--29, Springer, 2004.
 
25
 
26
A.O. Puig, E.B. Mansilla, "Analysis of reduction algorithms for XCS classifier system", Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, pp. 383--390, IOS Press, 2004.
 
27
Microsoft Portable Executable and Common Object File Format Specification, Windows Hardware Developer Central, Updated March 2008.
 
28
F-Secure Virus Description Database, available at http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/.
 
29
 
30
VX Heavens Virus Collection, VX Heavens website, available at http://vx.netlux.org.

Collaborative Colleagues:
M. Zubair Shafiq: colleagues
S. Momina Tabish: colleagues
Muddassar Farooq: colleagues