| An improved secondary ranking for many objective optimization problems |
| Full text |
Pdf
(278 KB)
|
Source
|
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
POSTER SESSION: Track 7: evolutionary multiobjective optimization
table of contents
Pages: 1837-1838
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Hemant Kumar Singh
|
University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
|
|
Amitay Isaacs
|
University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
|
|
Tapabrata Ray
|
University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
|
|
Warren Smith
|
University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11, Downloads (12 Months): 52, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Many objective optimization refers to optimization problems for which the number of objectives is significantly greater than conventionally studied 2 or 3. For such problems, large number of solutions become non-dominated, which reduces the convergence pressure of the Evolutionary Algorithms~(EAs) towards the Pareto Optimal Front. Recently, alternate secondary ranking schemes for have been suggested for NSGA-II in lieu of crowding distance to expedite its convergence for many objective problems. In this paper, we improvise upon an existing scheme~(epsilon dominance). The proposed approach is found to perform better than the other substitute distance assignment methods for the problems studied in this paper. A new diversity metric has also been proposed, which can be used in order to compare the performance of the various EAs.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
K. Deb and S. Jain. Running performance metrics for evolutionary on Simulated Evolution and Learning (SEAL), pages 13--20, 2002.
|
| |
2
|
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 6:182--197, 2002.
|
| |
3
|
K. Deb, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, and E. Zitzler. Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. Evolutionary Computation, 2002. CEC '02. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on, 1:825--830, May 2002.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
M. Koppen and K. Yoshida. Substitute distance assignments in NSGA-II for handling many-objective optimization problems. In Lecture notes in Computer Science 4403: Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pages 727--741. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2007.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. SPEA2:Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Technical Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory(TIK), ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
|
|