ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
An improved secondary ranking for many objective optimization problems
Full text PdfPdf (278 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
POSTER SESSION: Track 7: evolutionary multiobjective optimization table of contents
Pages: 1837-1838  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
Authors
Hemant Kumar Singh  University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
Amitay Isaacs  University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
Tapabrata Ray  University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
Warren Smith  University of New South Wales at Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1569901.1570190
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many objective optimization refers to optimization problems for which the number of objectives is significantly greater than conventionally studied 2 or 3. For such problems, large number of solutions become non-dominated, which reduces the convergence pressure of the Evolutionary Algorithms~(EAs) towards the Pareto Optimal Front. Recently, alternate secondary ranking schemes for have been suggested for NSGA-II in lieu of crowding distance to expedite its convergence for many objective problems. In this paper, we improvise upon an existing scheme~(epsilon dominance). The proposed approach is found to perform better than the other substitute distance assignment methods for the problems studied in this paper. A new diversity metric has also been proposed, which can be used in order to compare the performance of the various EAs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Deb and S. Jain. Running performance metrics for evolutionary on Simulated Evolution and Learning (SEAL), pages 13--20, 2002.
 
2
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 6:182--197, 2002.
 
3
K. Deb, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, and E. Zitzler. Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. Evolutionary Computation, 2002. CEC '02. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on, 1:825--830, May 2002.
 
4
 
5
M. Koppen and K. Yoshida. Substitute distance assignments in NSGA-II for handling many-objective optimization problems. In Lecture notes in Computer Science 4403: Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pages 727--741. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2007.
 
6
 
7
 
8
E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. SPEA2:Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Technical Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory(TIK), ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hemant Kumar Singh: colleagues
Amitay Isaacs: colleagues
Tapabrata Ray: colleagues
Warren Smith: colleagues