ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Single-objective and multi-objective formulations of solution selection for hypervolume maximization
Full text PdfPdf (427 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
POSTER SESSION: Track 7: evolutionary multiobjective optimization table of contents
Pages 1831-1832  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
Authors
Hisao Ishibuchi  Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Japan
Yuji Sakane  Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Japan
Noritaka Tsukamoto  Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Japan
Yusuke Nojima  Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Japan
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1569901.1570187
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A new trend in evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) is the handling of a multi-objective problem as an optimization problem of an indicator function. A number of approaches have been proposed under the name of indicator-based evolutionary algorithms (IBEAs). In IBEAs, the entire population usually corresponds to a solution of the indicator optimization problem. In this paper, we show how hypervolume maximization can be handled as single-objective and multi-objective problems by coding a set of solutions of the original multi-objective problem as an individual. Our single-objective formulation maximizes the hypervolume under constraint conditions on the number of nondominated solutions. On the other hand, our multi-objective formulation minimizes the number of non-dominated solutions while maximizing their Hypervolume.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Beume, N., Naujoks, B., and Emmerich M. SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. European J. Operational Research 180, 3 (2007) 1653--1669.
 
3
Emmerich, M., Beume, N., and Naujoks, B. An EMO algorithm using the hypervolume measure as selection criterion. Proc. of EMO 2005, 62--76.
 
4
Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., and Nojima, Y. Iterative approach to indicator-based multiobjective optimization. Proc. of CEC 2007, 3697--3704.
 
5
Wagner, T., Beume, N., and Naujoks, B. Pareto-, aggregation-, and indicator-based methods in many-objective optimization. Proc. of EMO 2007, 742--756.
 
6
Zhang, Q., and Li, H. MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 11, 6 (2007) 712--731.
 
7
Zitzler, E., and Künzli, S. Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. Proc. of PPSN 2004, 832--842.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hisao Ishibuchi: colleagues
Yuji Sakane: colleagues
Noritaka Tsukamoto: colleagues
Yusuke Nojima: colleagues