ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Do not choose representation just change: an experimental study in states based EA
Full text PdfPdf (277 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
POSTER SESSION: Track 4: combinatorial optimization and metaheuristics table of contents
Pages 1799-1800  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
Authors
Maroun Bercachi  Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
Philippe Collard  Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
Manuel Clergue  Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
Sebastien Verel  Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1569901.1570168
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Our aim in this paper is to analyse the evolvability of diverse coding conversion operators in an instance of the states based evolutionary algorithm (SEA). Since the representation of solutions or the selection of the best encoding during the optimization process has been proved to be very important for the efficiency of evolutionary algorithms (EAs), we will discuss a strategy of coupling more than one representation and different procedures of conversion from one coding to another during the search. Elsewhere, some EAs try to use multiple representations (SM-GA, SEA, etc.) in intention to benefit from the characteristics of each of them. In spite of those results, this paper shows that the change of the representation is also a crucial approach to take into consideration while attempting to increase the performances of such EAs. As a demonstrative example, we use a two states SEA (2-SEA) which has two identical search spaces but different coding conversion operators. The results show that the way of changing from one coding to another and not only the choice of the best representation nor the representation itself is very advantageous and must be taken into account in order to well-desing and improve EAs execution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Maroun Bercachi, Philippe Collard, Manuel Clergue and Sebastien Verel "Evolving Dynamic Change and Exchange of Genotype Encoding in Genetic Algorithms for Difficult Optimization Problems". In Proceedings of CEC-07, (2007).
 
3
Sebastien Verel. "States based Evolutionary Algorithm". Technical Report, I3S Laboratory, (2008).
 
4
Philippe Collard and Manuel Clergue "Misleading Functions Designed from Alternation". In Proceedings of CEC-00, (2000).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Maroun Bercachi: colleagues
Philippe Collard: colleagues
Manuel Clergue: colleagues
Sebastien Verel: colleagues