| Search based data sensitivity analysis applied to requirement engineering |
| Full text |
Pdf
(419 KB)
|
Source
|
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Track 14: search based software engineering
table of contents
Pages 1681-1688
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Mark Harman
|
King's College London, Centre for Research on Evolution, Search and Testing, London, United Kingdom
|
|
Jens Krinke
|
King's College London, Centre for Research on Evolution, Search and Testing, London, United Kingdom
|
|
Jian Ren
|
King's College London, Centre for Research on Evolution, Search and Testing, London, United Kingdom
|
|
Shin Yoo
|
King's College London, Centre for Research on Evolution, Search and Testing, London, United Kingdom
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18, Downloads (12 Months): 43, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Software engineering is plagued by problems associated with unreliable cost estimates. This paper introduces an approach to sensitivity analysis for requirements engineering. It uses Search-Based Software Engineering to aid the decision maker to explore sensitivity of the cost estimates of requirements for the Next Release Problem (NRP). The paper presents both single- and multi-objective formulation of NRP with empirical sensitivity analysis on synthetic and real-world data. The results show strong correlation between the level of inaccuracy and the impact on the selection of requirements, as well as between the cost of requirements and the impact, which is as intuitively expected. However, there also exist a few sensitive exceptions to these trends; the paper uses a heat-map style visualisation to reveal these exceptions which require careful consideration. The paper also shows that such unusually sensitivity patterns occur in real-world data and how the proposed approach clearly identifies them.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Bagnall, A., Rayward-Smith, V., and Whittley, I. The Next Release Problem. Information and Software Technology 43, 14 (2001), 883--890.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Banjotopoulos, C. A Contribution to the Sensitivity Analysis of the Sea-Bed-Structure Interaction Problem for Underwater Pipelines. Computers&structures 40, 6 (1991), 1421--1427.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Christopher Frey, H., and Patil, S. Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods. Risk Analysis 22, 3 (2002), 553--578.
|
| |
8
|
Deb, K., and Gupta, H. Searching for Robust Pareto-Optimal Solutions in Multi-Objective Optimization. In Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO'05) (2005), vol. 3410, Springer, pp. 150--164.
|
| |
9
|
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on 6, 2 (2002), 182--197.
|
| |
10
|
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M.K.S., and Buhl, S.L. Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects. Journal of the American Planning Association 68, 3 (2002), 279--295.
|
| |
11
|
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M.K.S., and Buhl, S.L. How (In)ccurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects? Journal of the American Planning Association 71, 2 (2005), 131--146.
|
| |
12
|
Gunawan, R., Cao, Y., Petzold, L., and Doyle, F. Sensitivity Analysis of Discrete Stochastic Systems. Biophysical Journal 88, 4 (2005), 2530--2540.
|
| |
13
|
Levine, R., and Renelt, D. A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review 82, 4 (September 1992), 942--63.
|
| |
14
|
Osyczka, A. Multicriteria Optimization for Engineering Design. In Design Optimization (1985), pp. 193--227.
|
| |
15
|
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., Scott, E., et al. Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley Chichester, 2000.
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
|