ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Behavioural GP diversity for adaptive stock selection
Full text PdfPdf (3.92 MB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Track 13: real world application table of contents
Pages 1641-1648  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
Authors
Wei Yan  UCL, London, United Kingdom
Christopher D. Clack  UCL, London, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1569901.1570120
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a new mechanism for preserving phenotypic behavioural diversity in Genetic Programming. We provide a real-world case study for hedge fund portfolio optimization, and experimental results on real-world data that indicate the importance of phenotypic behavioural diversity both in achieving higher fitness and in improving the robustness of the GP population for continuous learning.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
H. Cobb. An investigation into the use of hypermutation as an adaptive operator in genetic algorithms having continuous, time-dependent nonstationary environments. Technical report, Naval Research Laboratory, 1990.
 
4
M.H. Dempster and C.M. Jones. A real-time adaptive trading system using genetic programming. Quantitative Finance, Vol 1, 2001.
 
5
 
6
 
7
J. Grefenstette. Genetic algorithms for changing environments. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2, pages 137--144. North Holland, 1992.
 
8
C. Karr. Genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic for adaptive process control. In Intelligent Hybrid Systems, Wiley, 1995.
 
9
R. Keller and W. Banzhaf. Explicit maintenance of genetic diversity on genospaces. Unpublished Manuscript, 1994.
10
 
11
P. Monsieur and E. Flerackers. Increasing the diversity of a population in genetic programming. In Proc. GECCO'01, page 185. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.
 
12
C. Reeves and H. Karata. Dynamic sequencing of a multi-processor system: a genetic algorithm approach. In Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms. Springer, 1993.
 
13
J. Rosca. Entropy-driven adaptive representation. In Proc. Workshop Genetic Programming: From Theory to Real-World Applications, pages 23--32, 1995.
 
14
C. Schoreels and J.M. Garibaldi. The effect of varying parameter on performance for adaptive agents in techical equity market trading. In Proc. ICCC, 2005.
 
15
W.F. Sharpe. The sharpe ratio. J. Portfolio Management, 21:49--58, 1994.
 
16
 
17
J. Herrmann. A genetic algorithm for minmax optimisation problems. Proc. CEC'99, vol. 2, pages 1099--1103. IEEE, 1999.
 
18
J.F. Miller. Evolving a self-repairing, self-regulating, french flag organism. LNCS, 3102:129--139, 2004.
 
19
F.W. Moore and O.N. Gacia. A new methodology for reducing brittleness in genetic programming. In Proc. NAECON'97, 1997.
 
20
V. Nissen and J. Propach. On the robustness of population-based versus point-based optimisation in the presence of noise. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2(3), 1998.
 
21
T. Soule. Operator choice and the evolution of robust solutions. In Genetic Programming Theory and Practice, Chapter 16, pages 257--270. Kluwer, 2003.
22

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wei Yan: colleagues
Christopher D. Clack: colleagues