ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Free lunches for neural network search
Full text PdfPdf (349 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Track 11: genetics-based machine learning table of contents
Pages 1291-1298  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
Authors
Riccardo Poli  University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
Mario Graff  University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1569901.1570074
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we prove that for a variety of practical situations, the no-free-lunch (NFL) theorem does not apply to algorithms that search the space of artificial neural networks, such as evolutionary algorithms. We find, in particular, that, while conditions under which NFL applies exist, these require extremely restrictive symmetries on the set of possible problems which are unlikely encountered in practice. In other words, not all algorithms are equally good at finding neural networks that solve problems under all possible performance measures: a superior search algorithm for this domain does exist.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Floares. Genetic programming and neural networks feedback linearization for modeling and controlling complex pharmacogenomic systems. In I. Bloch, A. Petrosino, and A. Tettamanzi, editors, Fuzzy Logic and Applications, 6th International Workshop, WILF 2005, Revised Selected Papers, volume 3849 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 178--187, Crema, Italy, Sept. 15-17 2005. Springer.
 
2
 
3
F. Gruau. Cellular encoding of genetic neural networks. Technical report 92-21, Laboratoire de l'Informatique du Parallilisme. Ecole Normale Supirieure de Lyon, France, 1992.
 
4
 
5
 
6
C. Igel and M. Toussaint. A no-free-lunch theorem for non-uniform distributions of target functions. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms, 3:313--322, 2004.
 
7
U. Johansson, T. Lofstrom, R. Konig, and L. Niklasson. Building neural network ensembles using genetic programming. In G. G. Yen, L. Wang, P. Bonissone, and S. M. Lucas, editors, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 2239--2244, Vancouver, 6-21 July 2006. IEEE Press.
 
8
W. Kirchherr, M. Li, and P. Vitanyi. The miraculous universal distribution. Mathematical Intelligencer, 19:7--15, 1997.
 
9
H. Kitano. Designing neural networks using genetic algorithms with graph generation system. Complex Systems, 4(4):461--476, Aug. 1990.
 
10
 
11
W. B. Langdon, S. J. Barrett, and B. F. Buxton. Genetic programming for combining neural networks for drug discovery. In R. Roy, M. Koppen, S. Ovaska, T. Furuhashi, and F. Hoffmann, editors, Soft Computing and Industry Recent Applications, pages 597--608. Springer-Verlag, 10-24 Sept. 2001. Published 2002.
 
12
 
13
 
14
D. J. Montana and L. Davis. Training feedforward neural networks using genetic algorithms. In N. S. Sridharan, editor, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI-89, volume 1, pages 762--767, Detroit, MI, 20-25 Aug. 1989. Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, CA.
 
15
D. E. Moriarty and R. Miikkulainen. Hierarchical evolution of neural networks. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pages 428--433, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 5-9 May 1998. IEEE Press.
16
 
17
R. Poli, W. B. Langdon, and N. F. McPhee. A field guide to genetic programming. Published via http://lulu.com and freely available at http://www.gp-field-guide.org.uk, 2008. (With contributions by J. R. Koza).
 
18
 
19
 
20
C. Schumacher, M. D. Vose, and L. D. Whitley. The no free lunch and problem description length. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), pages 565--570. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.
 
21
M. J. Streeter. Two broad classes of functions for which a no free lunch result does not hold. In Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference GECCO-2003, pages 1418--1430. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
 
22
A. Tsakonas, V. Aggelis, I. Karkazis, and G. Dounias. An evolutionary system for neural logic networks using genetic programming and indirect encoding. Journal of Applied Logic, 2(3):349--379, 2004.
23
 
24
D. Whitley, T. Starkweather, and C. Bogart. Genetic algorithms and neural networks - optimizing connections and connectivity. Parallel Computing, 14(3):347--361, Aug. 1990.
 
25
D. Whitley and J. P. Watson. Complexity theory and the no free lunch theorem. In E. K. Burke and G. Kendall, editors, Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques, chapter 11, pages 317--339. Springer US, 2005.
 
26
 
27
D. Wolpert and W. Macready. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):67--82, April 1997.
 
28
J. R. Woodward and J. R. Neil. No free lunch, program induction and combinatorial problems. In C. Ryan, T. Soule, M. Keijzer, E. P. K. Tsang, R. Poli, and E. Costa, editors, Genetic Programming, Proceedings of EuroGP'2003, volume 2610 of LNCS, pages 475--484, Essex, 14-16 Apr. 2003. Springer-Verlag.
 
29
B.-T. Zhang and H. Muhlenbein. Evolving optimal neural networks using genetic algorithms with Occam's razor. Complex Systems, 7:199--220, 1993.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Riccardo Poli: colleagues
Mario Graff: colleagues