ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the hybridization of SMS-EMOA and local search for continuous multiobjective optimization
Full text PdfPdf (597 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Track 7: evolutionary multiobjective optimization table of contents
Pages 603-610  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
Authors
Patrick Koch  TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Oliver Kramer  TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Günter Rudolph  TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Nicola Beume  TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1569901.1569985
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the recent past, hybrid metaheuristics became famous as successful optimization methods. The motivation for the hybridization is a notion of combining the best of two worlds: evolutionary black box optimization and local search. Successful hybridizations in large combinatorial solution spaces motivate to transfer the idea of combining the two worlds to continuous domains as well. The question arises: Can local search also improve the convergence to the Pareto front in continuous multiobjective solutions spaces? We introduce a relay and a concurrent hybridization of the successful multiobjective optimizer SMS-EMOA and local optimization methods like Hooke & Jeeves and the Newton method. The concurrent approach is based on a parameterized probability function to control the local search. Experimental analyses on academic test functions show increased convergence speed as well as improved accuracy of the solution set of the new hybridizations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
N. Beume, B. Naujoks, and M. Emmerich. SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective Selection based on Dominated hypervolume. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(3):1653--1669, 2007.
 
2
M. Box, D. Davies, and W. Swann. Nonlinear Optimization Technique, volume 5. Oliver and Boyd Ltd., 1969.
 
3
 
4
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 6(2):182--197, 2002.
 
5
M. Ehrgott and X. Gandibleux. Hybrid metaheuristics for multi-objective combinatorial optimization. In F. Almeida, M. J. B. Aguilera, and C. Blum, editors, Hybrid Metaheuristics, volume 4030 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 221--259. Springer, 2006.
 
6
M. T. M. Emmerich, A. H. Deutz, and N. Beume. Gradient-based/evolutionary relay hybrid for computing pareto front approximations maximizing the s-metric. In Hybrid Metaheuristics, pages 140--156, 2007.
 
7
J. Fliege, L. M. G. Drummond, and B. Svaiter. Newton's method for multiobjective optimization. Optimization Online, 2008.
 
8
J. Fliege and B. Svaiter. Steepest descent methods for multicriteria optimization. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 51(3):479--494, 2000.
9
 
10
H. Ishibuchi and T. Murata. Multi-objective genetic local search algorithm. In International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 119--124, 1996.
 
11
H. Ishibuchi and K. Narukawa. Some issues on the implementation of local search in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO 2004, pages 1246--1258, 2004.
 
12
H. Ishibuchi and T. Yoshida. Implementation of local search in hybrid multi-objective genetic algorithms: A case study on owshop scheduling. In Proc. of fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution And Learning, pages 193--197, 2002.
 
13
H. Ishibuchi, T. Yoshida, and T. Murata. Balance between genetic search and local search in memetic algorithms for multiobjective permutation flowshop scheduling. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 7:204--223, 2003.
 
14
A. Jaszkiewicz. Genetic local search for multiple objective combinatorial optimization. Technical report, 1998.
 
15
 
16
G. R. Raidl. A unified view on hybrid metaheuristics. In F. Almeida, M. J. B. Aguilera, and C. Blum, editors, Hybrid Metaheuristics, volume 4030 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1--12. Springer, 2006.
17
 
18
H. Schwefel. John Wiley&Sons, Inc., 1995.
 
19
 
20
 
21
R. Steuer. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. John Wiley&Sons, New York, NY, 1985.
 
22
D. Sudholt. Computational Complexity of Evolutionary Algorithms, Hybridizations, and Swarm Intelligence. PhD thesis, Technische Universtät Dortmund, Dortmund, 2008.
 
23
 
24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Patrick Koch: colleagues
Oliver Kramer: colleagues
Günter Rudolph: colleagues
Nicola Beume: colleagues