| Evolutionary algorithms and multi-objectivization for the travelling salesman problem |
| Full text |
Pdf
(557 KB)
|
Source
|
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Track 7: evolutionary multiobjective optimization
table of contents
Pages 595-602
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Martin Jähne
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Autonomous Intelligent Systems, Sankt Augustin, Germany
|
|
Xiaodong Li
|
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
|
|
Jürgen Branke
|
Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Germany
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21, Downloads (12 Months): 52, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper studies the multi-objectivization of single-objective optimization problems (SOOP) using evolutionary multi-objective algorithms (EMOAs). In contrast to the single-objective case, diversity can be introduced by the multi-objective view of the algorithm and the dynamic use of objectives. Using the travelling salesman problem as an example we illustrate that two basic approaches, a) the addition of new objectives to the existing problem and b) the decomposition of the primary objective into sub-objectives, can improve performance compared to a single-objective genetic algorithm when objectives are used dynamically. Based on decomposition we propose the concept "Multi-Objectivization via Segmentation" (MOS), at which the original problem is reassembled. Experiments reveal that this new strategy clearly outperforms both the traditional genetic algorithm (GA) and the algorithms based on existing multiobjective approaches even without changing objectives.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Dimo Brockhoff , Tobias Friedrich , Nils Hebbinghaus , Christian Klein , Frank Neumann , Eckart Zitzler, Do additional objectives make a problem harder?, Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, July 07-11, 2007, London, England
[doi> 10.1145/1276958.1277114]
|
| |
2
|
C. A. Coello Coello and G. Lamont. Applications of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2004.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
David S. Johnson and Lyle A. Mcgeoch. The traveling salesman problem: A case study in local optimization. In Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization. Wiley and Sons. Chapter 8, E. Aarts and J.K. Lenstra (Eds.).
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6:182--197, 2002.
|
| |
7
|
W. S. Gosset. The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6(1):1--25, March 1908. Originally published under the pseudonym "Student".
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Jensen, M. T. Helper-objectives: Using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for single-objective optimisation. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms 3(4), pages 323--347, 2004.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
S. Watanabe, K. Sakakibara. Multiobjective approaches in single objective optimization environment. In The 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 2, pages 1714--1721, 2005.
|
| |
13
|
T. Starkweather, S. Mcdaniel, C. Whitley, K. Mathias, D. Whitley, and M. E. Dept. A comparison of genetic sequencing operators. In Genetic Algorithms, pages 69--76. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
|
| |
14
|
Z. Yan, L. Zhang, L. Kang, and G. Lin. A new moea for multi-objective tsp and its convergence property analysis. In EMO, pages 342--354, 2003.
|
|