ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Multiobjectivization for parameter estimation: a case-study on the segment polarity network of drosophila
Full text PdfPdf (450 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Montreal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Track 3: bioinformatics and computational biology table of contents
Pages 209-216  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-325-9
Authors
Tim Hohm  ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Eckart Zitzler  ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1569901.1569931
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Mathematical modeling for gene regulative networks (GRNs) provides an effective tool for hypothesis testing in biology. A necessary step in setting up such models is the estimation of model parameters, i.e., an optimization process during which the difference between model output and given experimental data is minimized. This parameter estimation step is often difficult, especially for larger systems due to often incomplete quantitative data, the large size of the parameter space, and non-linearities in system behavior.

Addressing the task of parameter estimation, we investigate the influence multiobjectivization can have on the optimization process. On the example of an established model for the segment polarity GRN in Drosophila, we test different multiobjectivization scenarios compared to a singleobjective function proposed earlier for the parameter optimization of the segment polarity network model. Since, instead of a single optimal parameter setting, a set of optimal parameter settings exists for this GRN, the comparison of the different optimization scenarios focuses on the capabilities of the different scenarios to identify optimal parameter settings showing good diversity in the parameter space. By embedding the objective functions in an evolutionary algorithm (EA), we show the superiority of the multiobjective approaches in exploring the model's parameter space.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Auger and N. Hansen. Performance evaluation of an advanced local search evolutionary algorithm. In Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2005), volume 2, pages 1777--1784, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005. IEEE Press.
 
2
T. Bäck, D. B. Fogel, and Z. Michalewicz, editors. Handbook of Evolutionary Computation. IOP Publishing and Oxford University Press, Bristol, UK, 1997.
 
3
J. Bader and E. Zitzler. HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization. TIK Report 286, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), ETH Zurich, Nov. 2008.
 
4
N. Beume and G. Rudolph. Faster S-Metric Calculation by Considering Dominated Hypervolume as Klee's Measure Problem. Technical Report CI-216/06, Sonderforschungsbereich 531 Computational Intelligence, Universität Dortmund, 2006.
 
5
D. Bouyer, F. Geier, F. Kragler, A. Schnittger, M. Pesch, K. Wester, R. Balkunde, J. Timmer, C. Fleck, and M. H¨ulskamp. Two-Dimensional Patterning by a Trapping/Depletion Mechanism: The Role of TTG1 and GL3 in Arabidopsis Trichome Formation. PLoS Biol, 6(6):e141, 2008.
 
6
7
 
8
W. J. Conover. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley, 3 edition, 1999.
 
9
 
10
F. Geier, J. U. Lohmann, M. Gerstung, A. T. Maier, J. Timmer, and C. Fleck. A Quantitative and Dynamic Model for Plant Cell Regulation. PLoS ONE, 3(10):e3553, 2008.
 
11
J. Handl and J. Knowles. An Evolutionary Approach to Multiobjective Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(1): 56--76, 2007.
 
12
 
13
 
14
N. Hansen and S. Kern. Evaluating the CMA Evolution Strategy on Multimodal Test Functions. In X. Yao et al., editors, Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VIII), volume 3242 of LNCS, pages 282--291, Berlin, Germany, 2004. Springer.
 
15
N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: the covariance matrix adaptation. In Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 1996), pages 312--317, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1996. IEEE.
 
16
W. Hoeffding. Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301): 13--30, 1963.
 
17
T. Hohm and E. Zitzler. Modeling the Shoot Apical Meristem in A. thaliana: Parameter Estimation for Spatial Pattern Formation. In E. Marchiori, J. H. Moore, and J. C. Rajapakse, editors, Evolutionary Computation, Machine Learning and Data Mining in Bioinformatics, volume 4447 of LNCS, pages 102--113. Springer, 2007.
 
18
 
19
M. T. Jensen. Helper-Objectives: Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Single-Objective Optimisation. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms, 3(4): 323--347, 2004.
 
20
H. J. Jiang, M. A. A. S. Choudhury, and S. L. Shah. Detection and diagnosis of plant-wide oscillations from industrial data using the spectral envelope method. J Process Contr, 17:143--155, 2007.
 
21
 
22
 
23
P. Mendes and D. B. Kell. Non-linear optimization of biochemical pathways: applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation. Bioinformatics, 14(10):869--883, 1998.
 
24
C. G. Moles, P. Mendes, and J. R. Banga. Parameter Estimation in Biochemical Pathways: A Comparison of Global Optimization Methods. Genome Research, 13(11):2467--2474, 2003.
25
 
26
P. K. Polisetty, E. O. Voit, and E. P. Gatzke. Identification of metabolic system parameters using global optimization methods. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 3(4), 2006.
 
27
R. Quast, R. Baade, and D. Reimers. Evolution Strategies applied to the problem of line profile decomposition in QSO spectra. Astron Astrophys, 431:1167--1175, 2005.
 
28
B. J. Reardon. Optimization of densification modelling parameters of beryllium powder using a fuzzy logic based multiobjective genetic algorithm. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 6:735--746, 1998.
 
29
M. Rodriguez-Fernandez, J. A. Egea, and J. R. Banga. Novel metaheuristics for parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamical biological systems. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(483), 2006.
 
30
S. J. Ruuth. Implicit-explicit methods for reaction-diffusion problems in pattern formation. J Math Biol, 34(2):148--176, 1995.
 
31
D. S. Stoffer, D. E. Tyler, and A. J. McDougall. Spectral analysis for categorical time series: Scaling and the spectral envelope. Biometrika, 80(3):611--622, 1993.
 
32
D. S. Stoffer, D. E. Tyler, and D. A. Wendt. The Spectral Envelope and Its Applications. Stat Sci, 15(3):224--253, 2000.
 
33
E. O. Voit. Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
 
34
G. von Dassow, E. Meir, E. M. Munro, and G. M. Odell. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature, 406:188--192, 2000.
 
35
M. Yamaguchi, E. Yoshimoto, and S. Kondo. Pattern regulation in the stripe of zebrafish suggests an underlying dynamic and autonomous mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104(12):4790--4793, 2007.
 
36

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tim Hohm: colleagues
Eckart Zitzler: colleagues