ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On understanding transient interdomain routing failures
Full text PdfPdf (692 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 3  (June 2009) table of contents
Pages 740-751  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Feng Wang  School of Engineering and Computational Sciences, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA
Jian Qiu  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Lixin Gao  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Jia Wang  AT&T Labs-Research, Florham Park, NJ
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 83,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2008.2001952

ABSTRACT

The convergence time of the interdomain routing protocol, BGP, can last as long as 30 minutes. Yet, routing behavior during BGP route convergence is poorly understood. During route convergence, an end-to-end Internet path can experience a transient loss of reachability. We refer to this loss of reachability as transient routing failure. Transient routing failures can lead to packet losses, and prolonged packet loss bursts can make the performance of applications such as Voice-over-IP and interactive games unacceptable. In this paper, we study how routing failures can occur in the Internet. With the aid of a formal model that captures transient failures of the interdomain routing protocol, we derive the sufficient conditions that transient routing failures could occur. We further study transient routing failures in typical BGP systems where commonly used routing policies are applied. Network administrators can apply our analysis to improve their network performance and stability.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
 
4
 
5
A. Markopoulou, G. Iannaccone, S. Bhattacharyya, C. Chuah, and C. Diot, "Characterization of failures in an IP backbone," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, China, Mar. 2004, vol. 4, pp. 2307-2317.
6
 
7
8
 
9
C. Labovitz and A. Ahuja, "The impact of Internet policy and topology on delayed routing convergence," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, AK, Apr. 2001, vol. 1, pp. 537-546.
 
10
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
18
19
 
20
 
21
T. Griffin and G. T. Wilfong, "A safe path vector protocol," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2000, pp. 490-499.
 
22
 
23
L. Gao, T. Griffin, and J. Rexford, "Inherently safe backup routing with BGP," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, AK, 2001, pp. 547-556.
 
24
25
26
 
27
A. Feldmann, H. Kong, O. Maennel, and A. Tudor, "Measuring BGP pass-through times," in Proc. Passive and Active Measurement Conf. (PAM'04), Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, Apr. 2004, pp. 267-277.
 
28
D. Obradovic, "Real-time model and convergence time of BGP," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, New York, NY, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 893-901.
 
29
 
30
R. Teixeira, N. Duffield, J. Rexford, and M. Roughan, "Traffic matrix reloaded: Impact of routing changes," in Proc. Passive and Active Measurement Conf. (PAM'05), Boston, MA, Mar. 2005, pp. 251-264.
 
31
 
32
N. Kushman, S. Kandula, D. Katabi, and B. Maggs, "R-BGP: Staying connected in a connected world," in Proc. 4th USENIX Symp. Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Cambridge, MA, 2007, pp. 341-354.
 
33
F. Wang and L. Gao, "A full route aware routing protocol--Fast recovery from transient routing failures," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Phoenix, AZ, Apr. 2008, pp. 2333-2341.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Feng Wang: colleagues
Jian Qiu: colleagues
Lixin Gao: colleagues
Jia Wang: colleagues